Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.
Narrow down the conversation to these participants:
Discussions from these authors are shown:
Political party:
Electoral District (2011):
Electoral District (2013):
@9J34VJW1yr1Y
The testing of vaccines, medical devices, and safety of drugs has been vital for scientific research, however, society needs to weigh the ethics of testing. Animals that are considered "pests" or have a large population, and similar anatomy of humans should be supported, while protecting more vulnerable species. Research that can benefit human lives should be prioritized over cosmetics.
Only those animals who have been bred for the purpose of scientific testing, and ensure it is done as ethically as possible.
it depends on if the drug makes the animal unsafe for human consumption, if it does then no, if it doesn't then its fine because the animal wasn't used just for testing
It depends on the product - if it's harmful, then no.
Yes but it should depend on the animal and the product.
Yes if deemed absolutely necessary.
Yes, but only where no ther methods work and where we have no human volunters
@8TWKWGB4yrs4Y
It is crucial for medical testing
For vaccines and other medical interventions and only when no other non-animal model is available but not for cosmetic uses.
@8TKRLC54yrs4Y
No, they should use other alternatives such as synthetic replicas or donated human cell samples.
Yes, but it should be done ethically. Oversight would be needed.
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.
