Try the political quiz
+

Filter by type

Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.

17 Replies

 @99LTGDLfrom Ontario  answered…2yrs2Y

 @8V6K63MNew Democraticfrom British Columbia  answered…4yrs4Y

test on criminals in prison serving life or convinvicted of murder, violence against women/children/animals, and fraud related crimes

 @8V3LJZHNew Democraticfrom Saskatchewan  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, but in a safe and controlled environment with veterinary staff on hand, with minimal harm or stress to the animal

  @8TFVW57New Democraticfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8SJXC3VNew Democraticfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

Only for means of curing a deadly disease. That is it. Do not add excess stress than necessary.

 @8NW4PJ2from British Columbia  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, but only after extensive tests have been done to reduce the risk of harm to animal test subjects.

 @9B5GBLJNew Democraticfrom British Columbia  answered…2yrs2Y

 @98V6HLLNew Democraticfrom Manitoba  answered…2yrs2Y

No, animal testing is cruel and no longer necessary for the majority of things other than medicine; and we should find an alternative

 @8VT5WXKfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8V5Z6RLfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

only if absolutely necessary for important MEDICAL advancements, NOT cosmetics

 @8V5TPXXNew Democraticfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

No, unless it’s for the development of desperately needed vaccines. But human volunteers (who are not financially in dire straits) should be encouraged first.

 @8QVDPKNfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

No, and human testing should not be incentivized with money in order to discourage the more compromised in society from being taken advantage of.

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...