Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.
Show more types:
Narrow down the conversation to these participants:
Discussions from these authors are shown:
Political party:
Electoral District (2011):
Electoral District (2013):
@9FFRDFV2yrs2Y
Yes, only of it is ethical and does not harm the animal
@96KSTFXConservative3yrs3Y
Yes, if it’s beneficial for research purposes and if they’re doing early testing on animals that are considered pests
@946WVFP3yrs3Y
Yes, as long as they abide by the relevant moral and safety standards.
@92VCKC2Conservative3yrs3Y
if they have no other option and there's still many of that species
@8VN7J384yrs4Y
@8VN3SPMConservative4yrs4Y
Yes, as long as it is as painless as possible for the animals and serve a greater good for humanity .
@8VJ6J92Conservative4yrs4Y
The only animals that should ever be exposed to these things are mice and rats as they are extremely numerous and an overall pest.
@8VFD2CZ4yrs4Y
Yes, but only animals that there are too much of, like rats
@8TZ2ZC44yrs4Y
No, test on violent criminals or criminals who have committed heinous crimes instead.
@8KNNZN6Conservative4yrs4Y
Yes, but only for animals with violent history.
@8CTCX4KConservative5yrs5Y
No, citizens should have the right to apply to test for the safety of drugs, vaccines, medical devices, and cosmetics with payment.
@96FGKV93yrs3Y
it will be better to use animals that are in high amount
@9228GBBConservative3yrs3Y
Yes but not on household pet’s
@8HZP93DConservative5yrs5Y
Yes, but only when all regulations are met and animal welfare is maximized.
@8GJ55J3Conservative5yrs5Y
Yes, as long as proper safety measures are taken to ensure the animal is not being abused by researchers outside of testing.
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.
