Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.
Narrow down the conversation to these participants:
Discussions from these authors are shown:
Political party:
Electoral District (2011):
Electoral District (2013):
@8ZSJL5B3yrs3Y
Yes, but only for vaccines and medications. That is the law, under Section 3 of the Nuremberg Code.
@8Z7DWC93yrs3Y
No, only for medications and vaccines.
@8XCDZYT3yrs3Y
Yes, but only for safety of medicines and vaccines.
@8V95QN24yrs4Y
Only in the safety of medicinal drugs and vaccines, not devices or cosmetics or anything else. We should continue to ratify the Nuremberg Code in Canada to prevent clinical trials being skipped over, because one of the leading causes of death is medical malpractice and failure to provide animal trials.
@8TNDXCT4yrs4Y
Only in medical research, i.e. vaccines and medications. Nothing else.
@8TF629D4yrs4Y
Yes, but Only for medications and vaccines
@8RWBHS34yrs4Y
Only vaccines, nothing else. Anything else is pure animal cruelty
@8Q5CJW34yrs4Y
No, this should be illegal, end animal testing.
@8PXK8WV4yrs4Y
No this is cruelty to animals
@8P4P98S4yrs4Y
No, this is animal cruelty and should be a Federal offense. Punishable by 15 years in prison.
@8KLHHQY4yrs4Y
No, this is animal cruelty.
@8HDGVYC5yrs5Y
No, ban this practice it is cruelty to animals.
@8DC73B25yrs5Y
No, ban this practice it is cruelty to animals and needs to be stopped right now.
@8SHNHYV4yrs4Y
Only for vaccines, but nothing else. Only use animals equivalent to humans. But the rest is animal cruelty at its finest.
@8RJ5L744yrs4Y
No, this is cruelty. Unless if it is vaccines, and only on rats. But regardless, ban animal testing.
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.
