Foreign electoral interventions are attempts by governments, covertly or overtly, to influence elections in another country. A 2016 study by Dov H. Levin concluded that the country intervening in most foreign elections was the United States with 81 interventions, followed by Russia (including the former Soviet Union) with 36 interventions from 1946 to 2000. In July 2018 U.S. Representative Ro Khanna introduced an amendment that would have prevented U.S. intelligence agencies from receiving funding that could be used to interfere in the elections of foreign governments. The amendment would…
Read moreNarrow down the conversation to these participants:
Discussions from these authors are shown:
Province/Territory:
@B4B4XQX2wks2W
Corporations do it all the time. Borders are fake. I somehow care less about government bodies like the us cia interfering in elections and I resent the use of the word foreign.
@B2WHSNHNew Democratic2mos2MO
Yes, but only to protect human rights and the environment, as other countries' leaders can affect our own lives and livelihoods with these areas
@8TG6NWW4yrs4Y
Yes but only to ensure they are fair and accountable.
@firozsasi4yrs4Y
The influence should reach people at grass root level.
@9BHFBKZ2yrs2Y
@8Z87ZRQ3yrs3Y
Yes, pressure them to catch up w the West in women's rights, children's, LGBT and animal. Cultural relativism is a cowardly betrayal of rights that MUST be universal.
Foreign elections in other countries aren't really any of Canada's business to be honest.
@Canadian14yrs4Y
Stating opinions is fine but that’s all.
@8TY2F6H4yrs4Y
United Nations should collectively agree and do so. This way no one country is singled out as being intrusive.
@8QMNNXJ4yrs4Y
Canada should fund socialist political parties.
@98HTVSQ2yrs2Y
This is a game as old as countries its a necessary evil
@96JJRBT2yrs2Y
Yes, but only for Socialist parties.
@8TXCC9Y4yrs4Y
Yes, if the elected party would be a serious threat and hazard to the most unprotected of the population or is hostile and violent to canada and what it stands for
@8LVHB2K4yrs4Y
Yes, but only to protect the country from human rights violations by a tyrannical ruler, by influencing public opinion.
@9JK2D7G1yr1Y
Only to the extent it can be used to break up authoritarian regimes. Democratic countries are not to be interfered with.
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.