Try the political quiz
+

Filter by type

Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.

13 Replies

 @8VN69CCLibertarianfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

We should keep universal healthcare but also offer a fast-lane private system for people in urgent need of medical care and need to see a specialist. The system would still be fair, but those who could afford to pay for private care could see a specialist as long as they could afford the service, rather than waiting in line.

 @36DLLNTanswered…4yrs4Y

Yes, but only after reworking the current budget to allocate funding to universal healthcare.

 @5GHSCDS from Minnesota  answered…4yrs4Y

 @5GHSCDS from Minnesota  answered…4yrs4Y

 @5GHSCDS from Minnesota  answered…4yrs4Y

 @5GHSCDS from Minnesota  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8R2RMP3 from New York  answered…4yrs4Y

No, but drastically increase funding and expand eligibility for Medicaid.

 @5GHSCDS from Minnesota  answered…3yrs3Y

 @63ZXW6N from Arizona  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, as long as people can still use private and it doesn't raise our taxes.

 @63ZXW6N from Arizona  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, as long as the other stuff is eliminated, people can still use private, and our tax is not over 20%.

 @76WTH56 from Wisconsin  answered…4yrs4Y

If it's in a smaller scale like local or state and local amd state choice, yes.

 @8D5J4RR from Minnesota  answered…4yrs4Y

If a few conditions are met:
1. The system doesn't raise our national debt
2. If people don't use it as a way to get unhealthier and then just have the government pay for it
3. It removes the bureaucracy involved with normal healthcare

I'm guessing it wouldn't happen.

 @5GHSCDS from Minnesota  answered…4yrs4Y

No, I support a "mixed-model" system where private funds are supplemented by public grants.

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...