Try the political quiz
+

Filter by type

Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.

Filter by author

Narrow down the conversation to these participants:

Electoral District (2013):

54 Replies

 @9YJFPW2New Democraticfrom Ontario  answered…5mos5MO

In the event we can fix our economy, reduce our defecit, catch up on housing, and unclog public services then yes. But right now we can’t afford it

 @9MF8SPN from Connecticut  answered…11mos11MO

Universal income should depend on the degree of need of the citizen. For as long as the citizen in mind is also working a viable job or receiving an education, then they should be guaranteed income to help them with high costs necessities.

 @8V5TNQWNew Democraticfrom British Columbia  answered…4yrs4Y

UBI is good for those who can't work due to medical reasons, mental health reasons or sudden loss of job. People who do work and pay higher taxes should not have to be responsible for funding these areas for people who just refuse to work.

 @948L3W4New Democraticfrom Alberta  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, but it should be high enough to assist with payment of basic needs, but low enough as to not discourage entry into the workforce.

 @8V28JMZNew Democraticfrom Nova Scotia  answered…4yrs4Y

I believe this should be the case for people who are working jobs that don't require college or university level background; cashier, barista etc.

 @8SD6JYBNew Democraticfrom Alberta  answered…4yrs4Y

This should be case-to-case depending on the individual's income, expenses, etc.

 @8R4SVN4New Democraticfrom British Columbia  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, as long as they are working or volunteering or doing something to benefit the economy and doesn't harm economic growth.

 @8QFCQGTNew Democraticfrom British Columbia  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8PPRN77New Democraticfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, as long as it's not a replacement for existing welfare benefits and doesn't simply commodify these services and institutions

 @8NS8XRHNew Democraticfrom Nova Scotia  answered…4yrs4Y

I think there should be a basic income to people who can prove they are unable to work.

 @8FTQPJJNew Democraticfrom Quebec  answered…5yrs5Y

 @8VFC6N2New Democraticfrom British Columbia  answered…4yrs4Y

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…3yrs3Y

No, this would create the need for drastic restructuring of funding for existing social programs, and the plan would be difficult to administer as the cost-of-living varies greatly in different regions of the country. Expand existing social programs instead by raising their income cap so more people qualify for their benefits

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…3yrs3Y

No, this would create the need for drastic restructuring of funding for existing social programs, and the plan would be difficult to administer as the cost-of-living varies greatly in different regions of the country. Expand existing social programs instead by raising their income cap so more people can qualify for their benefits

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…3yrs3Y

No, cost of living varies greatly in different parts of the country, so expand the funding for existing social welfare programs instead and raise the maximum income cap so more people can qualify for participation

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…3yrs3Y

No, this would create the need for drastic restructuring of funding for existing social programs, and such a plan would be too difficult to administer as the cost-of-living varies greatly in different regions of the country. Expand existing social programs instead by raising their income cap so more people can qualify for their benefits

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…3yrs3Y

No, needs testing is more effective by using progressive taxation to increase funding and expansion of existing federal welfare, housing, and food stamp programs

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…4yrs4Y

No, needs testing can be more effectively assured by using progressive taxation to increase funding and expand the coverage of existing federal welfare and housing programs as well as the federal food stamps program

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…3yrs3Y

No, increase funding for already established social welfare programs and raise the cap on income eligibility requirements

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…3yrs3Y

No, increase funding and raise the income eligibility requirements for already established social welfare programs instead

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…3yrs3Y

No, this would cause massive restructuring of budget funding for already established social welfare programs that provide economic assistance. Increase funding and lower the income eligibility requirements for these programs instead

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…3yrs3Y

No, this would cause massive budget restructuring of funding for existing social welfare programs. Increase funding for these instead and raise the income eligibility cap to qualify for them

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…3yrs3Y

No, this would cause massive budget restructuring of funding for existing social welfare programs. Increase funding for these instead and raise the maximum income eligibility cap

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…3yrs3Y

No, this would cause massive budget restructuring of funding for existing social welfare programs. Increase funding for those instead and raise the maximum income cap so more people can be eligible

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…3yrs3Y

No, this would cause massive budget restructuring of funding for existing social welfare programs. Increase funding for these instead and raise the maximum income cap so more people can be eligible for them

 @8QDSNZY from New York  answered…4yrs4Y

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…3yrs3Y

No, this would cause massive budget restructuring of existing social welfare programs. Increase funding for these programs instead, and raise the maximum income cap to widen eligibility

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…3yrs3Y

No, basic income sufficiency will vary greatly based on the number of individuals in a household and the cost of living in different areas of the country. Increase funding for existing social welfare programs instead, and raise the maximum income cap to qualify for these programs

 @8FC78TK from North Carolina  answered…5yrs5Y

 @8Q6744C from Michigan  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8VMBRZV from California  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8VWHPN6 from Michigan  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8WR9V2Y from Maine  answered…3yrs3Y

Only if it doesn't decrease support for exisiting social welfare programs

 @8XZCH8R from New York  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes but they have to prove they aren’t wasting the money on things like drugs and such

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…3yrs3Y

No, this would cause massive budget restructuring of funding for existing social welfare programs. Increase funding for these programs instead, and raise the maximum income cap to widen eligibility

 @8YLB2GR from Indiana  answered…3yrs3Y

 @8R8K8WM from Massachusetts  answered…4yrs4Y

 @jennamarieanswered…4yrs4Y

Yes, for all minors, elders (65+), pregnant women, new mothers, people with physical or mental issues, and involuntary unemployed willing to train and accept job offers and as a replacement for the current welfare system, but A pilot project should be commissioned and its result studied before implementing a universal basic income program

 @8532KYJ from Georgia  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, but it should not be universal, it should only go to the impoverished, the working poor, and lower middle class families

 @8XT5R4B from New York  answered…3yrs3Y

While i can agree to a certain extent that the UBI would cause some to dropout of the workforce, it benefits those that can't work and have no source of income.

 @8TQHNB4 from Texas  answered…4yrs4Y

everyone should receive an income to cover basic necessities if they are unable to work due to disability

 @8VC2Q88 from Virginia  answered…3yrs3Y

 @8C6X86C from Kansas  answered…5yrs5Y

Yes, but only for unemployed but require employment after an amount of time unless disabled or an elderly. Needs more requirements before approval.

 @8SFDLS6 from Iowa  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, but at the current point in time with the deficit and debt, it should not be implemented currently. Maybe someday in the future.

 @57QKT6Tanswered…3yrs3Y

Yes, we are rapidly coming to a point in time where automation will make it difficult for everyone to find a job, especially those with disabilities or other factors preventing them from "moving up" in the world; all citizens should have their basic needs met with the option of working to gain more money for extras.

 @6K8N8XC from Illinois  answered…5yrs5Y

Use it to replace the current welfare system, which incentivizes people to stay poor rather than build themselves up.

 @78Q5L5B from California  answered…4yrs4Y

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…3yrs3Y

No, this would create the need for drastic restructuring of funding for existing social programs, and the program would be difficult to administer as the cost-of-living varies greatly in different regions of the country. Expand existing social programs instead by raising the income cap so more people qualify for their benefits.

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...