Try the political quiz
+

Filter by type

Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.

Show more types:

Reply

  Deletedanswered…3yrs3Y

Yes, switch to a unitary parliamentary proportional representation system like Croatia.

 @Thomasj239 from Georgia  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, a unitary parliamentary system with proportional representation would be better.

  Deletedanswered…4yrs4Y

Switch to a multi party system like Israel. Proportional representation.

  Deletedanswered…4yrs4Y

Yes, switch to a multi party system like Israel were smaller parties form coalitions.

  Deletedanswered…4yrs4Y

Switch to a proportional representation system like Israel were smaller parties have to pass a certain percentage of the population to gain seats.

  Deletedanswered…4yrs4Y

Switch to a system like Israel where proportional representation is in use. Each party needs to pass a percentage of the population. Smaller parties will allow different representation on the national stage.

  Deletedanswered…4yrs4Y

Switch to a system like Israel's where proportional representation in use. Each party has to pass a certain percentage to gain acceptance into the government.

 @dandymananswered…4yrs4Y

No, but reform so that votes are distributed proportionally and implement ranked voting systems at the state level

  Deletedanswered…3yrs3Y

Yes, switch to the French system for the presidential election and have a proportional representation system.

 @58KJPR5answered…5yrs5Y

  Deletedanswered…3yrs3Y

Yes, switch to a unicameral legislature system with a proportional representation system.

  Deletedanswered…3yrs3Y

Yes, switch to a unicameral parliamentary system with proportional representation.

 @92TDH8M from Illinois  answered…3yrs3Y

  Deletedanswered…3yrs3Y

Yes, switch to a unitary proportional representation system. For the president do elections like the ones in France.

 @8ZMD43W from New Jersey  answered…3yrs3Y

  Deletedanswered…3yrs3Y

Yes, switch to a proportional representation system. Presidential elections should be like those in France. The legislative branch should be unicameral.

  Deletedanswered…3yrs3Y

Yes, we need to switch to a unicameral parliamentary system with a proportional representation system.

 @9334YP3answered…3yrs3Y

No, and each state should be given the same number of electors, who are distributed according to the winner-takes-all results of each voting district within the state. Furthermore faithless electors should receive the death penalty.

 @ThomasJj88 from Georgia  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, switch to a unitary parliamentary system with a proportional representation system.

  Deletedanswered…4yrs4Y

Yes, would love switch to a proportional representation system like Israels. Smaller parties form coalitions to get things done.

  Deletedanswered…4yrs4Y

Switch to a proportional representation system like Israel. Smaller parties have to form coalitions with each other in order to succeed.

  Deletedanswered…4yrs4Y

  Deletedanswered…4yrs4Y

  Deletedanswered…4yrs4Y

Yes, and switch to a system like Israel's. Smaller parties form coalitions to get thins done.

  Deletedanswered…4yrs4Y

Switch to a proportional representation system like Israel where smaller parties have to form coalitions.

  Deletedanswered…4yrs4Y

Switch to a system like Israel. A proportional representation parliament were each party has to get a certain % of the population to vote for them in order to get seats.

 @8TP6QKSanswered…4yrs4Y

No, and each state should be fixed at the same number of electors, who are distributed proportionally to the winner-takes-all results per voting district.

  Deletedanswered…4yrs4Y

Switch to a system like Israel. A proportional representation parliament.

  Deletedanswered…4yrs4Y

Yes, switch to a proportional representation system were each party has to get past a certain threshold of the population in order to get into the parliament. Smaller parties have to make coalitions.

  Deletedanswered…4yrs4Y

Switch to a proportional representation system like Israel's. Parties have to form coalitions to get things done.

  Deletedanswered…4yrs4Y

  Deletedanswered…5yrs5Y

We should switch to a multi-party system by using proportional representation like the Israeli system.

  Deletedanswered…4yrs4Y

  Deletedanswered…4yrs4Y

Switch to the Israeli System where proportional representation is in place.

  Deletedanswered…3yrs3Y

Yes, the US should implement a unitary parliamentary system with proportional representation.

 @Thomasjj68 from Georgia  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, switch to a unitary parliamentary system with proportional representation.

 @8YYBYBH from California  answered…3yrs3Y

No, but they should take precautions on who is counting cause there are some cheaters out there.

 @8ZDTH53answered…3yrs3Y

No, but the electoral college should be required to vote for the candidate chosen by their state.

 @3DSBJC3answered…3yrs3Y

Yes but only if we incorporate a representative democracy system based on ranked voting instead of winner take all system. The electoral college ensures representation of the whole country instead of just major cities.

 @Paulsechristanswered…4yrs4Y

No, but states should reform their election system to something other than first past the post .

 @58RCYKKanswered…4yrs4Y

Yes, because the notion that big cities would outvote rural areas becomes obsolete if the Electoral College is abolished. There would be no "red states" or "blue states", only "red" or "blue" individuals.

 @8QDSNZY from New York  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, Switch to a representative democracy (popular vote) system and let people use ranked choice voting

 @8QDZ34H from Georgia  answered…4yrs4Y

No, it should be modified and made in a way that each electoral vote is INDEPENDANT from all the others.

 @8QNP2M5 from Maryland  answered…4yrs4Y

Revise the electoral college where all states vote like Maine and Nebraska. A ranked voting system such as STV should also be incorporated.

 @5643HNNanswered…4yrs4Y

Yes, and reform our voting system for transferable/runoff voting for second/third-place options to replace our winner-take-all system

 @8PHF9LQ from Missouri  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, the country as a whole should decide rather than a few select people to “speak for everyone”

 @887SFZP from New York  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes; switch to a ranked voting system, a fully representative democracy, and additionally abolish the Senate

 @8R2RMP3 from New York  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, and the President should be directly elected by state legislatures.

 @8R2RMP3 from New York  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8R2RMP3 from New York  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8R2RMP3 from New York  answered…4yrs4Y

No, but reform so that each state (and D.C.) is allotted one electoral vote.

 @8R2RMP3 from New York  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8R2RMP3 from New York  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8R2RMP3 from New York  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8R2RMP3 from New York  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8R2RMP3 from New York  answered…4yrs4Y

No, but remove the 435-seat limit on the House of Representatives and remove the requirement that a candidate must win a majority of electoral votes.

 @8R2RMP3 from New York  answered…4yrs4Y

 @92JXK3J from New York  answered…3yrs3Y

Reform to a system that doesn't just benefit the top two parties, but also ensure that city folks are not in control of the votes and that they are equal with rural populations.

 @8GFG7RX from New Jersey  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8RSTXFT from Arizona  answered…4yrs4Y

No, but there should be a way for more than two parties to make it to the final election.

 @8CYNLQJ from New York  answered…5yrs5Y

 @8HJP9WN from Idaho  answered…4yrs4Y

No, but the electors must accurately represent the state's overall political affiliation and not change their minds.

 @8H6HGJ2 from Pennsylvania  answered…4yrs4Y

No, but reform with ranked voting and distribute votes proportionally from those results.

 @8KX67Q9 from California  answered…4yrs4Y

No, but it should be reformed to ensure proportional distribution of votes.

 @92YHQCV from California  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, and A. switch to a ranked-choice star voting system, & B. switch to a representative democracy (popular vote) system.

 @7BHMMDZ from New Hampshire  answered…5yrs5Y

No, as it allows for smaller state representation, but we should switch from a first past the poll to preferential voting system

 @84JHJXZ from GU  answered…4yrs4Y

No, but I believe that we should implement an online ranked voting system in our elections.

  @BestPoliticsIN from Indiana  answered…4yrs4Y

No, but the voting method should be changed to ranked choice voting, to make a hybrid system

 @8PPXTDP from Minnesota  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8H4DF7B from Arizona  answered…4yrs4Y

No but have it legally binding that the representatives have to vote for who they say they will. Also, have the same number of house and senate members per state be representatives. Have all citizens rank the candidates and if there is a tie the second highest person wins. Abolish the winner take all system.

 @8WJKP85 from Iowa  answered…3yrs3Y

 @8MKJFKZ from North Carolina  answered…4yrs4Y

I don't believe I know enough about how the electoral college works to make a well-informed decision, because I know that it can be both good and bad, I will need to do plenty of research before coming to a conclusion. That being said, it does often seem unnecessary and/or discouraging to democracy.

 @chneljm from New Hampshire  answered…3yrs3Y

No, but the electoral college system needs to be completely reformed and updated

 @IINXMP from Pennsylvania  answered…4yrs4Y

No, but reform the electoral college from a winner-take-all system to an electoral college with individual districts.

 @8YJZQSK from New Jersey  answered…3yrs3Y

 @3868DQWanswered…4yrs4Y

Yes, each person's vote should have equal say and the candidate who the most Americans vote for should win the election.

 @4ZTD62Kanswered…4yrs4Y

Yes, along with the two-party system. We should have popular and rank-based voting, as well as shifting to a multi-party parliamentary system.

 @63WMKH8 from Illinois  answered…5yrs5Y

No, but reform so that votes are distributed proportionally instead of the winner take all system and the balance of votes by population should be updated

 @68QRLZT from Louisiana  answered…4yrs4Y

No, but the system should be reformed to allow for ranked choice voting

 @6NLNK8C from Florida  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, and dismantle the two-party system as it is designed to reduce options and remove power and control from the general public.

 @6LSBY9W from Michigan  answered…5yrs5Y

 @6R6HBQ3 from Ohio  answered…4yrs4Y

No, but reform to the STAR voting system, operating separately above and below the electorate, or, barring that, approval voting, or, barring that, instant runoff

 @75KFLPS from Connecticut  answered…4yrs4Y

Ranked choice ballots and/or proportional distribution of electoral college votes would both alleviate many issues in the current system without having to fight a culture war over the existence of the college or arguing over votes per state.

 @75KRFBJ from Nebraska  answered…4yrs4Y

 @kgtiberius from Wisconsin  answered…4yrs4Y

No, but allow and protect faithless Electoral College electors and mandate a single transferable voting system both in the Electoral College and in popular votes for Federal, State, and local elections.

 @78S5M87 from Wisconsin  answered…5yrs5Y

switch to a ranked choice voting system so everyone has a more fair chance

 @7W3SBDC from Florida  answered…4yrs4Y

Phase it out. Something other than this winner take all system. Our election system is rather strong (despite popular belief) other countries envy how efficient and population based we usually are.

 @89SH3SL from Wisconsin  answered…4yrs4Y

 @88NZKDZ from New York  answered…3yrs3Y

 @MasterShrey21 from Oklahoma  answered…4yrs4Y

States should award electoral votes the same way as Maine and Nebraska.

 @89CDM9C from Kansas  answered…3yrs3Y

No, but allow for a ranked voting system. Party primaries should also switch to a ranked voting system.

 @Landon-Dillard from North Carolina  answered…3yrs3Y