Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.
Show more types:
Narrow down the conversation to these participants:
Discussions from these authors are shown:
Electoral District (2011):
Yes, any tax paying citizen that can pass a test that shows they understand the mechanisms of our political system should be able to vote.
Yes, for people younger than 18, only those who pass a test demonstrating their understanding of politics should be allowed to vote.
Should be reduce to 17 instead of 18. Legally can have a full license, job, and is criminally responsible.
No. Engaging young voters is challenging. Helping young voters get engaged in politics is EVERY Canadians responsibility.
i mean like i have no problem with the voting age i dont think it should be lowered do i think its ludicriss to have 18 year olds vote yes but also it brings freedom to some kids you know
Yes, and education related to politics should be part of the school curriculum and accessible for all students
I think it should be lowered to young adults such as 15-17 but nothing under those ages. Also the people need to be educated.
16 should be allowed to vote since they are considered as young adults and they can take drive test,work, and rely on the government too. And at this age they should be responsible enough
The voting age should remain
Yes, so long as the individual is well-informed and understands the political issues well enough to make said decision.
kids are the future and are smarter then adults think. if kids under the age of 18 can pass a test about how they understand politics they should be allowed to vote
Yes, but a test is required to test basic understanding of issues and knowledge for said test must be freely provided
yes but no as well for the fact that some kids would do things to be popular or what not
Yes, only if they are studying economics as a subject in education. For them to get a better understanding of what the situation is.
yes, so long as the school system adjusts their learning criteria so that young people can fully understand what their vote is working towards
No, but the vote of people that have reached retirement age should count as half a vote
People should be allowed to vote if they turn 18 that year, not just if they are 18 on election day.
Yes, classes teaching on politics should be manditory
Yes, but they should be given the choice of whether they believe they are ready or not
There should be a test that discerns whether you're allowed to vote as long as you're above the age of 15.
As long as they pass a basic test that shows their understanding of politics.
if you are able drive I feel as if you should be able to vote
Yes voters under 18 just have to pass a basic test of political
Yes, only if schools start having world-issues classes to make sure students are educated in politics.
Younger voters should pass a test
Yes, but younger citizen's votes should be less influential
A special committee should be put forward to study this proposition.
The minimum voting age should be set to 17
The voting age should stay at 18 because voting is a serious responsibility that affects our country and 18 year olds are more mature and have more knowledge of politics. If the voting age remains at 18, teenagers have more time to familiarize themselves with the candidates and ongoing issues, so that when the time comes for them to vote, they will have a better understanding.
Yes, though people should be evaluated based on their understanding of politics.
I mean I am neutral about this. I do not have any sides. But if I was to choose It should stay the same as 18 years old.
There should be a maximum age like 60-70
Yes. But non-high school/GED graduates would have a weighted vote of 1. High school graduates would have weighted vote of 2. There would be two levels of tests/courses offered that would after passing/completion add 1 weighted value to their ballot per course/test. Maximum weight value is 4. This would allow for intelligent/informed votes to be merited as more important and stronger.
Although one may not be an adult yet, many teenagers are very educated and passionate and should have the right to use their voice. So, yes.
I would love that but people have to know who and why to vote so no it should stay the same but have an exception if the government feels someone younger can vote they can vote then.
I think if they are underage but have a good understanding should be able to vote
Yes, but voters should be required to pass a basic text demonstrating their understanding of policies in order to vote, education on political topics from a non- bias stand point should be an option in all schools
yes, and those above the "legal voting age" should be tested for understanding politics and the stances of all candidates
we should have people pass a a basic test showing they are mentally stable and they should have the right when they are self sustainable.
Yes. I believe it should be 16, however I also believe that testing people's understanding of politics and law be a requirement to vote.
At least 25 so you have good world experience
Yes (lowered to age 16), but all voters this age and above should be required to pass a basic test demonstrating their understanding of politics in order to vote
The voting age stays the same, but any foreigner that is new and wants a say in voting (and is paying taxes) can vote, maybe just a year before the minimum voting age.
Yes, but only if the person who is under 18 shows a good level of understanding of politics in order to vote.
Everyone 16+ gets one vote, everyone who can pass a comprehensive test agreed to by political parties representing 90 percent plus of Canadians should get an additional vote
for local elections only 14 and up should he able to vote
Yes, but voters under 18 should be required to take a basic test demonstrating their understanding of politics in order to vote.
No, the voting age is at a good number
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.
