Try the political quiz
@ISIDEWITHQuestionsimmigrationStarted 8yrs agoActive 2 days ago

Should immigrants be deported if they commit a serious crime?

In 2015 the U.S. House of Representatives introduced the Establishing Mandatory Minimums for Illegal Reentry Act of 2015 (Kate’s Law.) The law was introduced after San Francisco 32 year old San Francisco resident Kathryn Steinle was shot and killed by Juan Francisco Lopez-Sanchez on July 1, 2015. Lopez-Sanchez was an illegal immigrant from Mexico who had been deported on five separate occasions since 1991 and been charged with seven felony convictions. Since 1991 Lopez-Sanchez had been charged with seven felony convictions and deported five times by the U.S. Immigration and Naturaliza…  

Read more
+
Expand
+ Settings

Filter by type

Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.

Show more types:

Filter by author

Narrow down the conversation to these participants:

Political theme:

Ideology:

Political party:

Province/Territory:

Electoral District (2011):

Electoral District (2013):

Postal Code:

Polling Division:

148 Replies

 @9F8VWSZfrom Alberta  answered…2yrs2Y

If they are citizens of Canada they should be tried as Canadians, if they are not yet they should be deported unless they won't be safe in their home country (ie. they are of an identity that will face persecution, they are personally at risk if they return, or if the punishment for their crime would be inhuman such as torture or the death penalty.)

 @9F233YSfrom British Columbia  answered…2yrs2Y

If they're a citizen then no. If they have t become citizen, yes. If it's safe

 @96M2JLWLiberalfrom British Columbia  answered…3yrs3Y

Only for terrorist attacks.

 @92XTCTNfrom Ontario  answered…3yrs3Y

Hiubhavent specified what exactly is a serious crime. If you mean murder then yes they should be deported after serving time

 @925JXGRfrom Ontario  answered…3yrs3Y

As long as they're not a Canadian citizen and the crime is a serious one

 @8VKF469from Quebec  answered…4yrs4Y

Only if they have not served any time for their crime

 @8V5DYM7from British Columbia  answered…4yrs4Y

If we had implements in place to aid the immigrants that the government itself approves to enter to country this wouldn't be an issue in the first place.

 @8V3FQ7Bfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

Only if they never had citizenship and it is safe for them to return to their country of origin. If they are citizens then they should be imprisoned in Canada.

 @8TXY7BLfrom Alberta  answered…4yrs4Y

Sometimes, and particularly of they are not yet citizens.

 @8TJ7RB6Conservativefrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

If they serve their sentence they should not be deported

 @8T47Z2Pfrom British Columbia  answered…4yrs4Y

I think so only only if it is extremely serious where it harms plenty of Canadian citizens

 @8SG8RBCfrom Alberta  answered…4yrs4Y

There must be a bench mark of how serious the crime is. If it passes it, then the person must be deported

 @8SD43Z6from Alberta  answered…4yrs4Y

yes and no. although it still depends on the records of the individual

 @8RDRC96from Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

Only if the crime is violent, sexual, or a hate crime.

 @8R2MFRTfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

if they serve there time and be free and do another series crime then yes deport them because he does not want to change

 @8PZDRSHfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

Case by case basis to be determined in a court of law

 @8PXFNGVLiberalfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, if they have commited the serious crime as an adult and it is safe for them to return to their country

 @8PKCWBBfrom Nova Scotia  answered…4yrs4Y

Only if it would be safe for them to return

 @8P9DDJMfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

Only if they are not citizens or they pose a serious risk to Canada and their home country is safe

 @8DSTBMMfrom Alberta  answered…5yrs5Y

Only if these commit very serious crime (murder, sexual abuse)

 @9C7LBXWNew Democraticfrom Ontario  answered…2yrs2Y

No, they should be treated the same as other citizens

 @98XJ7KQfrom Ontario  answered…2yrs2Y

It depends on how long they've been in the country. Some people came here from a very young age and are a product of Canada's environment and not their country of origin.

 @9863HW4from Manitoba  answered…2yrs2Y

Did the person steal a candy bar or a child? There’s a difference

 @8TW58RJLiberalfrom Alberta  answered…4yrs4Y

Depending on the type of the crime

 @8Q5YVK4from Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, but after they have finished serving their sentence and if it's safe to return them their country

 @8HLXBVQfrom Quebec  answered…5yrs5Y

Depends on the severity of the crime. Hate-based or religion-based etc.

 @8QFCFP7 from Missouri  answered…4yrs4Y

No, rehabilitate them and give them a path to citizenship

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…5yrs5Y

No, only if they have entered the country illegally and committed a violent felony or trafficked cartels of the most lethal drugs.

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, only for felonies of a violent nature

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, if they have entered the country illegally and committed felonies of a violent nature

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…5yrs5Y

No, only if they have entered the country illegally and committed a violent felony or trafficked cartels of the most lethal drugs

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, if they have entered the country illegally and committed a felony or felonies

 @83WFRPW from California  answered…5yrs5Y

No, but they should serve prison.

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...

More conversations

Join in on more popular conversations.

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…3mos3MO

Supreme Court Clears The Way For Trump Sentencing

Donald Trump will face sentencing over his New York “hush money” conviction on Friday, after the US Supreme Court declined to grant him a last-minute reprieve.The decision will force the president-elect to face public proceedings in the criminal case that he has fought strenuously to avoid. His lawyers had appealed to the high court on Wednesday to postpone the proceeding, claiming that allowing it to go ahead days before his inauguration would create a “constitutionally intolerable risk of disruption to national security” and interfere with his efforts to get his 34 felony convictions overturned.In a 5-4 decision handed down just hours before the sentencing was set to go ahead in a state court in lower Manhattan, a majority of the justices declined to do so, saying “the burden that sentencing will impose on the president-elect’s responsibilities is relatively insubstantial” especially as Trump was unlikely to face any prison time. They added that any issues with the evidence presented at trial — some of which Trump’s lawyers have claimed was inadmissible — “can be addressed in the ordinary course on appeal”.Trump-appointed Justice Amy Coney Barrett joined Chief Justice John Roberts and the three liberals on the bench in refusing to grant Trump’s appeal.Trump said in a post on Truth Social that he appreciated the Supreme Court’s time but vowed to continue fighting the case. “For the sake and sanctity of the Presidency, I will be appealing this case, and am confident that JUSTICE WILL PREVAIL,” he said.Lawyers representing Trump did not immediately respond to a request for comment.Trump’s sentencing was repeatedly postponed while he mounted his third campaign for the White House and pursued various appeals against his conviction. Last week Judge Juan Merchan, who oversaw the “hush money” trial in New York earlier this year, finally set a firm date, in order to bring what he called “finality to this matter”.Trump will probably not face any punishment when he is sentenced, however, as the judge previously indicated he would not impose a fine or condemn Trump to prison time.

▲  1619 replies

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…5mos5MO

Chaos in Europe: Germany’s Government Collapses As Trump Returns

Germany’s coalition government collapsed on Wednesday after Chancellor Olaf Scholz sacked his finance minister Christian Lindner, plunging the eurozone’s largest economy into political chaos hours after Donald Trump’s victory in the US presidential election.Scholz told reporters he would table a confidence vote in parliament on January 15, which most observers expect him to lose. That will pave the way for snap elections in March.Lindner’s sacking and the departure of his pro-business Free Democrats (FDP) from the government brings the curtain down on a deeply unpopular coalition that had become a byword for discord and acrimony.It leaves a void at the heart of Europe just as concern is growing in EU capitals over what a second Trump presidency will mean for transatlantic relations.Germany and the rest of Europe now face a long period of uncertainty they can ill-afford as they brace for a trade war with the US while trying to fend off a growing economic threat from China.In a blistering statement delivered in the chancellery, Scholz blamed Lindner for the breakdown of the government, calling him “selfish” and “irresponsible”. He said he “cared only about his own clientele and the short-term survival of his own party”.The trigger for Lindner’s dismissal was a dispute over next year’s budget. The three coalition partners — Scholz’s Social Democrats (SPD), Lindner’s FDP and the Greens — could not agree on how to plug a €9bn hole in spending plans ahead of a meeting of parliament’s budget committee next week.However, the conflict became overlaid with deeper ideological divisions over how to deal with Germany’s economic downturn and how much public debt the government is legally allowed to raise.Scholz said he had asked Lindner to agree to loosen Germany’s “debt brake”, a cap on new borrowing which is enshrined in the constitution and which the SPD and Greens have long wanted to reform.That would have allowed Germany to take on more debt and so boost its support for Ukraine, at a time when fears are growing Trump might cut aid to Kyiv once installed in the White House.Scholz said he had also proposed capping network charges to bring down energy prices for industrial companies, creating incentives for businesses to invest, and passing a package of measures to safeguard jobs in the car industry, which faces more competition from China.

▲  299 replies

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…6mos6MO

Trump’s Puerto Rico Problem Erupts in Pennsylvania: Latino Voters Fire Back

Donald Trump has a serious Puerto Rico problem — in Pennsylvania.Many Puerto Rican voters in the state are furious about racist and demeaning comments delivered at a Trump rally. Some say their dismay is giving Kamala Harris a new opening to win over the state’s Latino voters, particularly nearly half a million Pennsylvanians of Puerto Rican descent.Evidence of the backlash was immediate on Monday: A nonpartisan Puerto Rican group drafted a letter urging its members to oppose Trump on election day. Other Puerto Rican voters were lighting up WhatsApp chats with reactions to the vulgar display and raising it in morning conversations at their bodegas. Some are planning to protest Trump’s rally Tuesday in Allentown, a majority-Latino city with one of the largest Puerto Rican populations in the state.And the arena Trump is speaking at is located in the middle of the city’s Puerto Rican neighborhood.“It’s spreading like wildfire through the community,” said Norberto Dominguez, a precinct captain with the local Democratic party in Allentown, who noted his own family is half Republican and half Democratic voters.“It’s not the smartest thing to do, to insult people — a large group of voters here in a swing state — and then go to their home asking for votes,” Dominguez said.The timing couldn’t be worse for Trump. Almost a week before Election Day, he’s pushing to cut into Harris’ margins among Latinos, especially young men who are worried about the economy. But the comments from pro-Trump comedian Tony Hinchcliffe Sunday night, referring to Puerto Rico as a “floating island of garbage,” has reverberated throughout Pennsylvania and elsewhere, prompting even the former president’s Republican allies to defend the island and denounce the comments. And with the race essentially a toss up, every vote counts — especially in Pennsylvania.“This was just like a gift from the gods,” said Victor Martinez, an Allentown resident who owns the Spanish language radio station La Mega, noting some Puerto Rican voters in the area have been on the fence about voting at all.

▲  3116 replies