Narrow down the conversation to these participants:
Discussions from these authors are shown:
Electoral District (2011):
Electoral District (2013):
Polling Division:
@8ZR8QDRConservative3yrs3Y
No, but their leaders need to be accountable to their constituents for their spending.
I think make an economy for them that they can run them selves and then don’t give them more money
@8TXVXML4yrs4Y
No, but individual natives should be offered owning a crowned land homestead that they will end up owning for their own use, rent, leasing out or resale if they so-choose.
@8TQ845B4yrs4Y
Funding should stay as it is and extra funding should be doled out pin a case by case basis.
@8SZ6KSB4yrs4Y
No, we should instead transfer ownership of all Crown land deeds to Aboriginal communities.
@8SF7VWZ4yrs4Y
They should be given sovereignty from the state if they want it
@8QSFRYQ4yrs4Y
Yes, but they should be integrated into our society as citizens
@8Q6PG47Libertarian4yrs4Y
uncertain, I don't think throwing money at people will solve any social issues
@8PJMGYM4yrs4Y
We should try to reduce the debt and deficit, but if we can reallocate funding from other issues than we can keep giving them some funding, but we should allow them to be independent from the government and let them do their own thing
@8NXRYZTLibertarian4yrs4Y
They should be given the right to own property. Divide up reserves . They should receive a 1/8 royalty for all resources on there lands . They should recieve preference in contracts on there lands for 25 to 50 years
@8NWB7Z8Libertarian4yrs4Y
No special interest or minority group should receive funding from any government.
yes but they y need to not rise it too much
@92569NCLibertarian3yrs3Y
Yes, to support their land, education, and important societal institutions
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.
