Try the political quiz
@ISIDEWITHQuestionseconomyStarted 12yrs agoActive 23hrs ago

Should the government raise taxes on the rich?

Should Canada raise taxes on the rich?

Australia currently has a progressive tax system whereby high income earners pay a higher percentage of tax than low income tax. A more progressive income tax system has been proposed as a tool towards reducing wealth inequality.

+
Expand
+ Settings

Filter by type

Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.

Filter by author

Narrow down the conversation to these participants:

Ideology:

Political party:

Political theme:

Voting for candidate:

Province/Territory:

Electoral District (2011):

Electoral District (2013):

Postal Code:

Polling Division:

218 Replies

 @B4F9SGDfrom Ontario  answered…3wks3W

Yes. How much money is enough?? When you hit a certain amount of money like 50 million+ your taxes should be higher. It is easier to make money when you have money…something that most people don’t have the luxury of. So to me, if you have such a luxury, then you can afford to help those who don’t have this luxury by paying more taxes. It’s nothing personal.

 @B4B6L3Qfrom Ontario  answered…4wks4W

Income tax should be reduced but followed up with a wealth tax that makes the rich pay more and poor pay less

 @9TBN9CSIndependentfrom Ontario  answered…8mos8MO

No, but enforce federal regulations that enforce the rich to pay and prevent tax evasions through any legal loopholes.

 @9F7JQGCfrom Ontario  answered…2yrs2Y

Tax accordingly though reform the tax laws to stop overtaxing hardworking residents. there is no point in taxing someone for overworking yet the cooperations write off almost everything.

 @8XZYC7Yfrom Ontario  answered…3yrs3Y

a flat tax would be a good start to that of fixing tax loopholes in the system

 @8WV5GLWConservativefrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

Tax shouldn't be a thing and could be dealt with easy it was made in ww1 when needed

 @8W6KC6MNew Democraticfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, abolish extremes of wealth and poverty

 @8VJYCRWConservativefrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

Not allowing certain Incomes so many tax breaks

 @8V5Q623from Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

Tax Corporations and the wealthy

 @8TYTGYSConservativefrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

Get rid of the tax loopholes for the rich and corporations

 @8TPHN48from Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

No, reduce tax on income and increase tax on property.

 @8PKTF66Liberalfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

Major tax reform

 @8PJV7BKfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

i like it how it is

 @8GLXM95from Ontario  answered…5yrs5Y

Create a tax bracket for those who make over $500,000 or $1,000,000 a year. This bracket could then have rules that make sense applied to it.

 @8D65MY4from Ontario  answered…5yrs5Y

Depending on how much they make

 @97NRTW8from Ontario  answered…2yrs2Y

Taxes should be lowered from top to bottom.

 @95HR3MFfrom Ontario  answered…3yrs3Y

increase the tax on the rich and lower the tax for the poor

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...

More conversations

Join in on more popular conversations.

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…6mos6MO

Axis of Desperation: Russia Recruits North Korean Soldiers in Ukraine War

Secretary of Defense Lloyd J. Austin III confirmed on Wednesday that North Korea had sent troops to Russia to join the fight against Ukraine, a major shift in Moscow’s effort to win the war. Mr. Austin called the North’s presence a “very, very serious” escalation that would have ramifications in both Europe and Asia.“What exactly are they doing?” Mr. Austin told reporters at a military base in Italy after a trip to Ukraine. “Left to be seen.” He gave no details about the number of troops already there or the number expected to arrive.Mr. Austin cast President Vladimir V. Putin’s need for North Korean mercenaries as a sign of desperation.“This is an indication that he may be in even more trouble than most people realize,” he said. “He went tin-cupping early on to get additional weapons and materials from the D.P.R.K.,’’ he said, using the abbreviation for Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, “and then from Iran, and now he’s making a move to get more people.”But he said intelligence analysts were still trying to discern whether the troops were moving toward Ukraine.Ukrainian officials insist they are headed there, and Ukraine’s defense minister was quoted on Wednesday saying he expected to see North Korean troops in Kursk, the Russian territory that Ukraine has occupied, in the coming days.Mr. Austin’s statement came as American intelligence officials said they were preparing to release a trove of intelligence, including satellite photographs, that show troop ships moving from North Korea to training areas in Vladivostok on Russia’s east coast and other Russian territory further to the north.For two weeks, there have been reports of the movements, fueled by the Ukrainian and South Korean governments, that more than 12,000 North Koreans were training to fight alongside Russian soldiers.American officials have said they estimate that 2,500 North Korean troops have been dispatched. But they made no estimate of how many more might follow, or even how well they might perform on territory that the North’s conscripts have never fought in, amid fellow fighters who speak a different language.

▲  1410 replies

Active 1wk ago

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…5mos5MO

Kamala Harris is considering running for president again in 2028

Kamala Harris has been lying low since her defeat in the presidential race, unwinding with family and senior aides in Hawaii before heading back to the nation’s capital.But privately, the vice president has been instructing advisers and allies to keep her options open — whether for a possible 2028 presidential run, or even to run for governor in her home state of California in two years. As Harris has repeated in phone calls, “I am staying in the fight.”She is expected to explore those and other possible paths forward with family members over the winter holiday season, according to five people in the Harris inner circle, who were granted anonymity to discuss internal dynamics. Her deliberations follow an extraordinary four months in which Harris went from President Joe Biden’s running mate to the top of the ticket, reenergizing Democrats before ultimately crashing on election night.“She doesn’t have to decide if she wants to run for something again in the next six months,” said one former Harris campaign aide. “The natural thing to do would be to set up some type of entity that would give her the opportunity to travel and give speeches and preserve her political relationships.”“She doesn’t have to decide if she wants to run for something again in the next six months,” said one former Harris campaign aide. “The natural thing to do would be to set up some type of entity that would give her the opportunity to travel and give speeches and preserve her political relationships.”Harris concedes: 'We must accept the results of this election'SharePlay VideoMost immediately, Harris and her advisers are working to define how and when she will speak out against Donald Trump and reassert her own role in the Democratic Party. Closing out her term as vice president, she’s set to preside over certifying the November election she lost to Trump, and then appear at the once-and-future president’s inauguration on Jan. 20.“There will be a desire to hear her voice, and there won’t be a vacuum for long,” a person close to Harris said.At the same time, Harris and her husband, Doug Emhoff, will have a long checklist to plow through before they leave the Naval Observatory for good.They have to decide whether they’ll take up permanent residence at their home in Los Angeles, or establish a base elsewhere. No matter where Harris and her family live, some around her have expressed concerns about safety, as her Secret Service protection expires six months after stepping away.

▲  1127 replies