@B29TS3B3mos3MO
Nuclear energy is essential as a temporary solution while investing in renewable alternatives. Nuclear energy produces just 15 grams of CO₂ per kilowatt-hour, making it one of the lowest-carbon energy sources, similar to wind and solar. It currently provides around 10% of global electricity, offering a stable and continuous supply, unlike intermittent sources like wind and solar. With global energy demand expected to rise by 47% by 2050, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration, nuclear energy can bridge the gap during the renewable transition.
Modern advancements, such as Small… Read more
@9LXT3F411mos11MO
I'm not saying that Nuclear Energy is the way to go forever, but as of now, life is tough. Our world is getting so complicated that getting the government to work on this specific topic is hard. Maybe one day there will be a solution, but there will never be. You see, more energy has to be put in to transfer to another energy source, and there's always consequences of some sort to all 'solutions'.
@9K6LJNT1yr1Y
That it should be increased with a careful amount of consideration because if other plans to reduce nuclear power does not work then you would still need to generate power some way or another.
@9J3KJMK 1yr1Y
Risk from nuclear accidents is very high and can cause potential long term environmental damage. Not to mention the disposal of radioactive waste remains to be a challenge.
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.
