Try the political quiz
+

Filter by type

Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.

127 Replies

 @996M5VFGreenfrom Ontario  answered…2yrs2Y

Yes. The reason being, is that nuclear energy is actually one of the cleanest energy sources on earth. It's just people are afraid to use it due to the Chernobyl incident, when in reality, that was an accident, and not something that would happen when nuclear energy is used.

 @9F9ZQ2BGreenfrom British Columbia  answered…2yrs2Y

 @8ZVBJLHGreenfrom Nova Scotia  answered…3yrs3Y

If it is used properly and you use it for the proper things and the things that you really need , just not wasting it .

 @8ZRT3NKGreenfrom British Columbia  answered…3yrs3Y

 @8T29B4XGreenfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

 @9CJGFV4Greenfrom Ontario  answered…2yrs2Y

There should be no public subsidy and not until the issues of waste disposal and potential radiation leakage are solved.

 @956XVNYGreenfrom British Columbia  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, provided that more money is allocated to nuclear energy research and safe, sustainable development.

 @8ZKW66HGreenfrom Ontario  answered…3yrs3Y

Allow nuclear operation until the end of useful life, with no new nuclear, while expanding renewable energy.

 @8L6S757 from Colorado  answered…4yrs4Y

It depends on what it is used on but generally no, we can use better renewable alternatives

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...