Try the political quiz
+

Filter by type

Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.

127 Replies

 @9F7JWQSfrom Alberta  answered…2yrs2Y

 @8VRC67Tfrom British Columbia  answered…4yrs4Y

Only if Nuclear Fission can be achieved. Nuclear power can be a great resource, but the risk potential is too high and we need to protect the land we have left

 @8TBJ94Zfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8RMBWFLfrom Manitoba  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8R7LVHVfrom Alberta  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8PJK4T8from British Columbia  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8PDRZ78from Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes as long as it is not a danger to the public and the people in the area are fully aware of the nuclear power plant.

 @8Y4ZK2Sfrom Quebec  answered…3yrs3Y

 @8VL39PCfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

No, and we need to educate people on this topic, and promote the idea of less consumption as an alternative to focusing on "clean energy"

 @8V5QXMRNew Democraticfrom Quebec  answered…4yrs4Y

No, and we should not build more power of any source to sell. Increase should be due to Canadian needs.

 @8TZSDVQLiberalfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

I think our waste should be used as energy. If other countries can do that so can we.

 @8TXMQ3Qfrom Nova Scotia  answered…4yrs4Y

Only if we can figure out good ways to deal with the waste and ensure safety with nuclear energy

 @8SD8G3Xfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes and no. The use of Nuclear energy could be useful, if the correct alternative to Uranium is used (Thorium). But, we should prioritize renewable energy first, as creating enough nuclear power plants to deter climate change is incredibly unrealistic.

 @95HQRN3New Democraticfrom Ontario  answered…3yrs3Y

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, and we should also increase investment in renewable alternatives such as wind, hydroelectric, thorium and geothermal.

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...