Try the political quiz
+

Filter by type

Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.

127 Replies

 @9DG796Ffrom Alberta  answered…2yrs2Y

Nuclear energy is the most efficient and cleanest of energy, except for they should be using thorium as opposed to uranium, and the reactor plants are to be set up in nine earthquake zones and nowhere close to a coastline

 @9TMMVLNNew Democraticfrom Alberta  answered…7mos7MO

yes, as long as there is people that work in the nuclear plant field that are well-educated and able tol identify problems with an well-preventative approach in a quick manner to reduce accidents.

 @8QD4K4Kfrom Alberta  answered…4yrs4Y

 @9CBTS97from Alberta  answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, but with due balance and whilst looking into more reliable alternatives. The use of nuclear energy shouldn't be completely out of practice for the time being.

 @99VLQTQfrom Alberta  answered…2yrs2Y

I would have to educate myself on this topic prior to making a decision.

 @8VR79MXfrom Alberta  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, although relatively expensive, it is a perfect and reliable replacement for fossil fuel derived electricity which could accelerate the transition away from fossil fuel energy. Regulations and red tape need to be revised.

 @8VJ5W9Rfrom Alberta  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, but new engineering design is required so that there is no risk of a meltdown

 @B34YX9Nfrom Alberta  answered…1mo1MO

Yes, but gradually invest in even cleaner alternatives such as wind, hydroelectric, thorium, and geothermal while needing to depend less and less on unsustainable energy sources

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...