Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.
Narrow down the conversation to these participants:
Discussions from these authors are shown:
Political party:
Voting for candidate:
@8MMHXYB4yrs4Y
No, some people are bad even thought they have a back round check.
@8TVYZQL4yrs4Y
No, only if there is evidence that the dealer did not properly give a background check on the buyer.
@8C7KPKS5yrs5Y
Why sue them they were just doing there job
@8FCYBSY5yrs5Y
No they shouldn’t because the gun did not do anything, the person behind it did.
@8GSTQWN4yrs4Y
No, they did not tell they buyer to shoot them or harm them with the gun. So it isn't the manufacturers fault.
@8J4WLPL4yrs4Y
No, The Misuse of a firearm is not the manufacturer's fault, it is the person in possession of that firearm's fault.
@8JBN6KV4yrs4Y
No. That is ridiculous! Unless the gun malfunctioned resulting in injury to user which would be a products liability tort - HELL NO! Guns do not kill people. People make the choice to kill people. NEVER direct the hate or fault on the manufacturer unless they made a faulty product.
@8Q4ZF564yrs4Y
if they were under-aged then they should be.
@8RMPMDK4yrs4Y
No it wasn't their fault someone went stupid and shot them
@8YX4JT93yrs3Y
The gun is only as dangerous as its user, not its producer.
Join in on more popular conversations.
