Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.
Narrow down the conversation to these participants:
Discussions from these authors are shown:
Political party:
Voting for candidate:
@7X7M5874yrs4Y
Yes, if the dealer did not sell the firearm properly.
@8WCV5PP3yrs3Y
No, however if the dealers and manufacturers had not done enough background checks and the proper research beforehand that couldve prevented the weapons from getting in the hands of wrong people in the first place, then they should be sued.
@8XT5R4B3yrs3Y
NO. We shouldn't be allowed to sue the gun maker because some fool used it in a crime. If this same fool ran me over with a Cadillac, should I be able to sue GM for making the car? Really?
@8VC2Q884yrs4Y
No, we should pass laws to prevent some of these purchases from being made
@75KRFBJ4yrs4Y
Yes, dealers, but only if it was sold illegally or if dealer knew it was for illegal purposes
@8F2GC995yrs5Y
Yes but only if they sold weapons they weren't supposed to be selling, this includes add ons as well.
@8HHKXYR4yrs4Y
yes, only if they did not do background checks
@8HQTH284yrs4Y
Yes, if those dealers or manufacturers failed to take the necessary verification steps.
@8QMB29J4yrs4Y
Why allow victims of gun violence to sue the company, it's like blaming a pencil for your misspelled words.
@8QVQFKD4yrs4Y
If they believed that the products would be used for sketchy purposes.
@8R6J3YW4yrs4Y
Yes, but only dealers because they are selling guns illegally, and putting fire arms in peoples hands that shouldn´t have a fire arm. A fire arm shouldn´t be easy to get.
@8W9KX2R3yrs3Y
They should sue the person who inflicted the person with gun violence. You stop the person who started the bomb, not the person who created it in a way.
Join in on more popular conversations.
