Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.
Narrow down the conversation to these participants:
Discussions from these authors are shown:
Political party:
Voting for candidate:
@8V37MX44yrs4Y
No because the manufacturers were not the ones who sold it to the person or told the person to do that to you
@8C7KPKS5yrs5Y
Why sue them they were just doing there job
@8FCYBSY5yrs5Y
No they shouldn’t because the gun did not do anything, the person behind it did.
@8PRKY7Q4yrs4Y
No, the manufacturer did not intend for their gun to be used as a weapon against the innocent.
@8RSRZ2H4yrs4Y
No, the manufacturers are not responsible for what happened.
@8SDSJ924yrs4Y
Manufacturers should not be held liable, but if dealers do not implement thorough background checks and training, and extensive psychological tests, then the dealer can and should be held liable.
@8V2C9ZY4yrs4Y
It depends on your way of thinking For instance If you were a serial killer and you shot someone then you should be sued not the arms dealer because you shot the person not the arms dealer and the arms dealer could help people that are in need of defense or protection then the people should be able to get the weapon but before that the dealer should check if you had a criminal record then they should call the police and let them handle the situation.
@8V2C9ZY4yrs4Y
It depends on your way of thinking For instance If you were a serial killer and you shot someone then you should be sued not the arms dealer because you shot the person not the arms dealer and the arms dealer could help people by not giving out weapons but before that the dealer should check if there are ways to help out others without giving out arms
@8V7X74H4yrs4Y
No unless they didn't do a strict background check or file the proper paper work to buy a gun
@8VVZH574yrs4Y
No it wouldn't be fair because theres lots of people who use fire arms for their safety.
@8X92WL93yrs3Y
Yes, but only if they know that there is something wrong with them.
Join in on more popular conversations.
