Try the political quiz
+

Filter by type

Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.

Show more types:

Engaged Voters

These active users have achieved a basic understanding of terms and definitions related to the topic of Military Spending

132 Replies

 @8TWDTHBConservativefrom Alberta  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, and capabilities in the north need to be prioritized and procurement must be rationalized.

 @9YGJXM9Conservativefrom Ontario  answered…6mos6MO

Generally it should be increased, but the goal should be to reduce the deficit. However, if there are situations where it is necessary to spend more on military, then it should be allowed.

 @9M3PSVWConservativefrom Ontario  answered…12mos12MO

It has the United States as an ally and NATO, which has the strongest military power, so, I would say neither.

 @9J4XYKZConservativefrom Alberta  answered…1yr1Y

If the citizens and government feel threatened at all by other countries, only then should military spending be increased.

 @9QTMDJTConservativefrom Ontario  answered…9mos9MO

The government should increase its military spending. We are too behind on our NATO and UN spending.

 @9F4JB39Conservativefrom Alberta  answered…2yrs2Y

There shouldn’t be need for fighting against other countries we should be mutual to benefit everyone

 @8ZM99PRConservativefrom Saskatchewan  answered…3yrs3Y

 @8Y9R7FFConservativefrom Alberta  answered…3yrs3Y

Decrease, along with every other county. I know money is needed to protect and defend but one of the most eye opening quotes I heard said "If every country in the world stopped funding war for just 1 day, nobody in the world would ever go hungry again". That is just such a no brainer to me, obviously I'm naive and don't completely understand, I just think war is so childish and unnecessary. I know being greedy and wanting power is a part of human nature is why it is needed along with all the bad people that need to warded off with force. I just find it excessive.

 @8RR2D5JConservativefrom Alberta  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, but with a focus on Peacekeeping and upgrading military equipment to modern standards.

 @8PZG5QPConservativefrom British Columbia  answered…4yrs4Y

Increase to match inflation and increase capital acquisition for automation and reduction of personnel costs.

 @9CBVH5CConservativefrom Alberta  answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, the government should spend more to bring the military out of the past enough that people don't have to fear for their lives because they are flying or driving something from the 1990's

 @98P34X7Conservativefrom Manitoba  answered…2yrs2Y

The Canadian military needs to increase their military spending by purchasing the best equipment possible. Canada citizens need to serve at least 3 years of service within the military from 18 to 45 years of age in order to be called a citizen of this country.

 @98ZL3DQConservativefrom Alberta  answered…2yrs2Y

Funds should increase, but only into certain areas of military research

 @87V5TYY from Connecticut  answered…4yrs4Y

 @87V5TYY from Connecticut  answered…4yrs4Y

 @87V5TYY from Connecticut  answered…4yrs4Y

 @87V5TYY from Connecticut  answered…4yrs4Y

Increase, but our procurement and other spending methods should be reviewed

 @87V5TYY from Connecticut  answered…4yrs4Y

Increase, but our procurement and other spending practices should be reviewed

 @87V5TYY from Connecticut  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8CN7P7L from New Jersey  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8HL5YXT from Arizona  answered…4yrs4Y

increase the military spending so long as it doesn't increase the national debt.

 @8QM9QMR from North Carolina  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8KH79S2 from Washington  answered…4yrs4Y

Neither they should use it better and only increase during wartime and conflict.

 @LangworthyUS9th from Michigan  answered…4yrs4Y

Increase spending if needed also look at ways to cut waste as much as possible. Our military must be always striving for better readiness and effectiveness. We should be mindful of the taxpayers while making sure we have the best and strongest military in the world. Negotiating for better contracts with companies. Pulling the troops home from Afghanistan would save a ton of money so that would negate the need for increased spending while still strengthening our capabilites and effectiveness.

 @87V5TYY from Connecticut  answered…4yrs4Y

 @63ZXW6N from Arizona  answered…4yrs4Y

Decreased if possible and of course within reason and ensuring it still functions as it should.

  @8RJ2TQK from Minnesota  answered…4yrs4Y

I think defense spending should be slightly reduced until we get the budget deficiet under control.

 @8T9PVS4 from Indiana  answered…4yrs4Y

Only when we need an excessive amount of armory/weapons. When we are not in any wars there is little reason to give even more money, except maybe for research and experimentation with new weapons.

 @IINXMP from Pennsylvania  answered…4yrs4Y

Decrease, and begin signing contracts with more private militias and companies, as well as deploying the national guard.

  @8R7JPB5 from Pennsylvania  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8XCJY2Y from Kansas  answered…3yrs3Y

 @8XSXMM6 from Oregon  answered…3yrs3Y

 @6HDD83R from California  answered…4yrs4Y

Increase, but only in countries where the U.S. is (with the approval of the U.S. congress) currently at war with. reduce the military personnel by half (only in military bases that are not in proximity to any armed conflict).

 @8Z4TXWG from Wisconsin  answered…3yrs3Y

They should spend enough to keep military maintained and strong but no more unless war is a possibility.

 @92MDVFR from Georgia  answered…3yrs3Y

Stabilize military spending and audit the current budget more meticulously. Bribery and kickbacks notoriously infiltrate military spending.

 @8Q6C4Y4 from Florida  answered…4yrs4Y

 @4PRKPMGanswered…4yrs4Y

Always make sure our troops have what they need to do their jobs effectively. Never decrease in a way that undermines their ability to do so, but only increase for the sake of our troops having what they need to keep doing their jobs at peak efficiency.

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...