President Obama recently declared that the U.S. will accept 10,000 refugees from Syria. The U.S. has been under pressure from its Syrian allies to help out with the crisis in which 3 Million refugees have fled Syria in the past year. Those in favor of accepting refugees believe that the U.S. has a duty to join its allies in Europe and accept at least 10,000 refugees. Opponents argue that the U.S. should stay out of this crisis and accepting refugees from the Middle East leads to a risk of letting terrorists into our borders.
Narrow down the conversation to these participants:
Discussions from these authors are shown:
Electoral District (2011):
@95N6GWJConservative3yrs3Y
Yes, They should have good background checks and not be recieving government money
@8VGM6ZT4yrs4Y
Just religious minorities and families.
@8V67NG24yrs4Y
Yes, but only if they are skilled tradesman and pass background checks
@8SX956P4yrs4Y
Citizen’s should fund refugees if they choose to
@8P5Z92S4yrs4Y
We would help way more people by actually resettling the refugees somewhere else in the Middle East because it would be a lot cheaper and we can support more people that way
@8NWWM794yrs4Y
Yes, but only mothers and children, the rest should go fight for their country.
@8NVVWBHConservative4yrs4Y
Refugees should be accepted only by charity of individuals not the state
@8KRZFZX4yrs4Y
High skilled immigrant workers. Not low skilled workers that would lower the wage for the working man.
@8R59YNH4yrs4Y
Yes but specifically those with buisness plans or higher education to reduce less people using our welfare system and putting strain on the economy
@6K36GJH4yrs4Y
They are trying to leave Syria. Yes.
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.
