President Obama recently declared that the U.S. will accept 10,000 refugees from Syria. The U.S. has been under pressure from its Syrian allies to help out with the crisis in which 3 Million refugees have fled Syria in the past year. Those in favor of accepting refugees believe that the U.S. has a duty to join its allies in Europe and accept at least 10,000 refugees. Opponents argue that the U.S. should stay out of this crisis and accepting refugees from the Middle East leads to a risk of letting terrorists into our borders.
Narrow down the conversation to these participants:
Discussions from these authors are shown:
Electoral District (2011):
@963SWNL3yrs3Y
depends on if we have to many jobs for the amount of people we have. or not enough homes for the people we already have.
@936YP663yrs3Y
Not only from Syria from other country too
they should accept other refugees to from other country too.
@92SSPLH3yrs3Y
Accepting refuge is OK if they place they come has opportunity. They are 2.5 times as likely to live in poverty and the mass immigration we are seeing now is driving down PPP for everyone.
@8VTVVQD4yrs4Y
Yes but provide necessary tools to incorporation them into our society such as education, employment programs, fair funding
@8VRYHFL4yrs4Y
They need to support themselves after a certain amount of years
@8VRYHCB4yrs4Y
Must display effort to get a job and provide for themselves
@8VHKMZK4yrs4Y
No, I feel that they should be redeployed in a country that better suits their current culture.
@8V9VYFW4yrs4Y
Yes, but drive immigration/rehousing to provinces with affordable housing options ex. maritimes or prairies to alleviate housing pressures from the major cities.
@8KT5F9D4yrs4Y
Yes, but any handouts they are given should be given to Canadian citizens living below the poverty line first.
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.
