President Obama recently declared that the U.S. will accept 10,000 refugees from Syria. The U.S. has been under pressure from its Syrian allies to help out with the crisis in which 3 Million refugees have fled Syria in the past year. Those in favor of accepting refugees believe that the U.S. has a duty to join its allies in Europe and accept at least 10,000 refugees. Opponents argue that the U.S. should stay out of this crisis and accepting refugees from the Middle East leads to a risk of letting terrorists into our borders.
Narrow down the conversation to these participants:
Discussions from these authors are shown:
Electoral District (2011):
@8VHKMZK4yrs4Y
No, I feel that they should be redeployed in a country that better suits their current culture.
@8TLSVP74yrs4Y
Yes, but a family member who is able to fight should have to train with the military and then be sent back to fight for their country. The exception would be for single parents.
@8T9ZST74yrs4Y
Yes, But after a thorough background check
Yes but with a Priority for families.
@8KWFYGH4yrs4Y
Yes, but not during the Coronavirus Pandemic.
@8VJSM9Z4yrs4Y
Y es, but only after extensive background checks and continuous monitoring to ensure they have no terrorist connections AND have something to offer our society (job)
@7PTCG385yrs5Y
Yes, but only accept a precautionary number of 5,000 families once extensive background checks are completed to confirm they have no terrorist connections.
@7PTCG385yrs5Y
Yes, but only accept 5,000 families (as a precaution against terrorist activities) once extensive background checks are completed to confirm they have no terrorist connections.
@7PTCG385yrs5Y
Yes, but only accept a precautionary number of 7,500 refugees once extensive background checks are completed to confirm they have no terrorist connections.
@7PTCG384yrs4Y
Yes, but only accept a precautionary number of 10,000 refugees once extensive background checks are completed to confirm they have no terrorist connections
@85QWNPG3yrs3Y
Yes, we should accept some refugees from every country in crisis, but it is more important that we make sure these individuals are not harmful radicals and therefor they should be held in neighboring sympathtetic territories until that can be assertained to the best of our ability.
@8FGK6J54yrs4Y
Yes, but cautiously until the pandemic has cooled down
@JWeissflog3yrs3Y
No have other nations closer to Syria that are part UN to accept Syrian refugees
@JWeissflog3yrs3Y
No have other nations closer to Syria that are part of the UN should first accept the refugees
@7PTCG384yrs4Y
Yes, we should accept 10,000 refugees once extensive background checks are completed to confirm they have no terrorist connections.
@7PTCG384yrs4Y
Yes, but only after extensive background checks and intermittent monitoring to ensure they have no terrorist connections
@7PTCG384yrs4Y
Yes, but only accept a precautionary number of 10,000 refugees once extensive background checks are completed to confirm they have no terrorist connections.
@7PTCG383yrs3Y
Yes, we should accept 10,000 refugees but only after extensive background checks.
@7PTCG384yrs4Y
Yes, but only after extensive background checks and intermittent monitoring to ensure they have no terrorist connections.
@7PTCG384yrs4Y
Yes, we should accept 10,000 refugees once extensive background checks are completed to confirm they have no terrorist connections
@7PTCG384yrs4Y
Yes, we should accept 10,000 refugees who have passed extensive background checks to rule out terrorist connections
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.
