President Obama recently declared that the U.S. will accept 10,000 refugees from Syria. The U.S. has been under pressure from its Syrian allies to help out with the crisis in which 3 Million refugees have fled Syria in the past year. Those in favor of accepting refugees believe that the U.S. has a duty to join its allies in Europe and accept at least 10,000 refugees. Opponents argue that the U.S. should stay out of this crisis and accepting refugees from the Middle East leads to a risk of letting terrorists into our borders.
Narrow down the conversation to these participants:
Discussions from these authors are shown:
Electoral District (2011):
@95Z6WZ43yrs3Y
we should evaluate them and see what use to the economy they can have
@8TVG8ZF4yrs4Y
Refugees should only be excepted on a temporary basis with the goal being sending then home when the circumstances allow
@8SX956P4yrs4Y
Citizen’s should fund refugees if they choose to
@8NYQPHWLibertarian4yrs4Y
Stop supporting the wars making the refugees
@8NVWBXP4yrs4Y
Let them in. Don't spend tax dollars on them in anyway.
@8NVVWBHConservative4yrs4Y
Refugees should be accepted only by charity of individuals not the state
@8KRZFZX4yrs4Y
High skilled immigrant workers. Not low skilled workers that would lower the wage for the working man.
@8TKD6G74yrs4Y
If an individual chooses to, yes.
@8TB798W4yrs4Y
Yes, but screening out criminals and jihadists is acceptable.
@6K36GJH4yrs4Y
They are trying to leave Syria. Yes.
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.
