Restorative justice programs focus on rehabilitating offenders through reconciliation with victims and the community, rather than through traditional incarceration. These programs often involve dialogue, restitution, and community service. Proponents argue that restorative justice reduces recidivism, heals communities, and provides more meaningful accountability for offenders. Opponents argue that it may not be suitable for all crimes, could be perceived as too lenient, and may not adequately deter future criminal behavior.
Statistics are shown for this demographic
Political party
Ideology
Province/Territory
Response rates from 282 Right voters.
32% Yes |
68% No |
24% Yes |
59% No |
8% Yes, but only if the crimes are non-violent |
9% No, provide restorative justice programs in addition to incarceration, not as an alternative |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 282 Right voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 282 Right voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Right voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@B27F3VN1mo1MO
Yes, but only if the crimes are non-violent, and only if it was a first offense. If it is a repeated offense, they should face real consequences.
@9ZNZZY82mos2MO
Yes, but only for first offences which are non-violent.
@9WQY7BP3mos3MO
Yes, but provide restorative justice programs in addition to incarceration, not as an alternative
@9WPPMKF3mos3MO
Yes, but only if the criminal is willing to change, and is showing signs of remorse.
@9VY5FM64mos4MO
Develop a program where the victim(s) have a larger role in the sentencing as well as receive better restitution for their suffering.
@9TW2CCS4mos4MO
Yes, if the crimes are non-violent as well as adding it to incarceration.
@9TQ65LH5mos5MO
Yes, but it should depend on the crime commit and the offenders age.
@9T8HZQY5mos5MO
Yes, but it needs to be assessed on an individual basis
Join in on the most popular conversations.
