+

Answer Overview

Response rates from 134 Liberalism voters.

15%
Yes
85%
No
15%
Yes
85%
No

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 134 Liberalism voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 134 Liberalism voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Liberalism voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @9LJGNWT from British Columbia  answered…1yr1Y

 @B4PPBZNfrom Ontario  answered…6 days6D

Only if at least one of the parents actively intends to use said embryos to produce a child with them.

 @B35KJ45from Ontario  answered…2mos2MO

This is such a loaded question and is filled with nuances, the parent should decide, not the state or anyone else

 @B32DRXZfrom Ontario  answered…2mos2MO

in the case of them being tampered with, they should be considered property and treated as such and the owner should be compensated for their loss or damage to their property like anything else .

 @B2ZJH9Gfrom Ontario  answered…2mos2MO

yes i believe they should be seen as life but not a child and not counted as murder if it gets damaged since it had not had the chance at that point to adpat into a human

 @B2VDB45from Ontario  answered…2mos2MO

Yes, but experimentation with embryonic cells should still be allowed. While embryos are unquestionable homo sapiens as per their cellular DNA, but research using these embryos can make life better for many people.

 @B29DRJCfrom Ontario  answered…4mos4MO

No, As no living human of any age can survive being frozen solid, especially for extended periods. However respect and care should be priority as it has the potential to grow into a meaningful part of society if raised correctly.

 @9WYDMSDfrom British Columbia  answered…6mos6MO

No, they should have special protections tho, to whoever it is, a frozen embryo is priceless and should be considered to be priceless property with extreme legal penalties for someone to destroy them.