+

Answer Overview

Response rates from 17.5k Left voters.

50%
Yes
50%
No
30%
Yes
50%
No
21%
Yes, but not for cosmetics

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 17.5k Left voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 17.5k Left voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Left voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @9FL248Zfrom Ontario  answered…1yr1Y

Use animals that will cause less public opinion to conduct experiments, and prohibit the use of endangered animals and nationally protected animals.

 @9RCRJ4Ffrom Nova Scotia  answered…4mos4MO

Definitely not for cosmetics, and not for situations where the substance places humans at little risk. All other options should be considered before animal testing, it should be an essential need for examining the action of the product or process.

 @9KMLH9Mfrom British Columbia  answered…9mos9MO

Yes, but only for things that are necessary to our lives, like vaccines, but not anything connected to cosmetics.

 @9KDYD2Wfrom Saskatchewan  answered…9mos9MO

Use proven criminals, convicted of violent crimes, who are in prison for 10+ years (or a life sentence)

 @9JZP7TYfrom Quebec  answered…9mos9MO

testing on animals should be avoided and only to be done in very restricted circumstances such as in medical safety only and restricted to only certain animals like mice and rats.

 @9JXG53Cfrom Ontario  answered…9mos9MO

it depends on if the drug makes the animal unsafe for human consumption, if it does then no, if it doesn't then its fine because the animal wasn't used just for testing

 @9JWQKH8from Saskatchewan  answered…9mos9MO

I agree there should be a boundary here of some sort cause of the organs. yet again the animal cruelty so depends I guess

 @9JSPMXFanswered…10mos10MO

Yes, but not for cosmetics and only if it's a necessity to ensure the medical safety of those whom may be affected by the product.