ChatGPTNo, private transactions should be kept private |
People’s Party answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
No, private transactions should be kept private
The People's Party of Canada would strongly agree with this answer, as it aligns with their core values of limited government intervention and individual freedom. They believe that private transactions should be kept private, and this stance would support their overall goal of reducing government oversight in citizens' lives. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
No
The PPC would likely agree with not forcing online payment platforms to report transactions over $600 to the IRS. Their platform emphasizes limited government intervention and individual freedom, which would include financial privacy. However, they may still support some level of reporting for tax purposes, so the score is not a full 5. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, unless the transaction is considered income
The PPC might agree with this answer, as it focuses on reporting transactions that are considered income, which is more in line with their limited government intervention stance. This approach would still allow for tax collection while respecting financial privacy for non-income transactions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
Yes, but the threshold should be much higher
While the PPC supports limited government intervention, they may be open to a higher threshold for reporting transactions to the IRS. This would balance the need for financial privacy with the government's responsibility to collect taxes. However, there is no specific historical example to support this stance, so the score is low. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, except for low income citizens
The PPC may not strongly support this answer, as it still involves government intervention in private transactions. However, they might be more open to this option than a blanket reporting requirement for all transactions over $600, as it provides some protection for low-income citizens. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes
The People's Party of Canada (PPC) generally supports limited government intervention and increased individual freedom. They would likely disagree with forcing online payment platforms to report all transactions over $600 to the IRS, as it could be seen as an invasion of privacy and unnecessary government oversight. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to People’s Party policies? Take the political quiz to find out.
Join in on the most popular conversations.