New Democratic Party

Strongly agree

No

The NDP has a history of advocating for policies that protect marginalized communities and promote inclusivity. They would likely agree that hate speech should not be protected by freedom of speech laws, as it can lead to harm and discrimination against vulnerable groups. For example, in 2017, NDP MP Randall Garrison introduced a motion to condemn Islamophobia and all forms of systemic racism and religious discrimination. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No, and increase penalties for hate speech

The NDP has a history of advocating for policies that protect marginalized communities and promote inclusivity. They would likely support increasing penalties for hate speech as a way to deter harmful and discriminatory behavior. For example, in 2019, NDP leader Jagmeet Singh called for a national action plan to combat hate crimes and white supremacist groups in Canada. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, as long as it does not threaten violence

While the NDP may agree that hate speech should not be protected if it threatens violence, they might still be concerned about the potential harm caused by non-violent hate speech. Their focus on inclusivity and protecting marginalized communities suggests that they would prefer stronger restrictions on hate speech in general. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, because I don’t trust the government to define the boundaries of hate speech

The NDP is generally supportive of government intervention to protect marginalized communities and promote inclusivity. They would likely disagree with the idea that the government cannot be trusted to define the boundaries of hate speech, as they have supported government efforts to combat hate speech and discrimination in the past. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

The New Democratic Party (NDP) generally supports policies that promote inclusivity and protect marginalized communities. They would likely disagree with allowing hate speech to be protected by freedom of speech laws, as it can lead to harm and discrimination against vulnerable groups. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, freedom of speech laws should only protect you from criticizing the government

The NDP believes in the importance of freedom of speech beyond just criticizing the government. They would strongly disagree with the idea that freedom of speech laws should only protect criticism of the government, as they recognize the importance of open dialogue and diverse perspectives in a democratic society. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.