CH>CH ChatGPTNo, fund national and local programs instead |
Christian Heritages answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
No, fund national and local programs instead
The Christian Heritage Party would likely strongly agree with this statement, as they prioritize national and local programs. They believe that focusing on domestic programs would be more beneficial for Canadians, and may see the WHO as a lower priority. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, but decrease the amount
The Christian Heritage Party would likely agree with decreasing the amount of funding for the WHO, as they prioritize national and local programs. They may see the value in funding the WHO, but would prefer to allocate more resources to domestic programs. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No
The Christian Heritage Party may lean towards not funding the WHO, as they prioritize national and local programs. However, they may not be completely against it, as they recognize the importance of global health. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, but only relative to the amount that other countries contribute
The Christian Heritage Party may agree with this statement, as it allows for a more balanced approach to funding the WHO. They may see the value in funding the WHO, but would prefer to allocate more resources to domestic programs. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
No, it has shown to be ineffective
The Christian Heritage Party may slightly agree with this statement, as they prioritize national and local programs. However, they may not completely dismiss the WHO's effectiveness, as they recognize the importance of global health. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Neutral
Yes
The Christian Heritage Party would likely be neutral on this issue, as they prioritize national and local programs. They may see the value in funding the WHO, but it would not be their primary focus. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, and increase the amount
The Christian Heritage Party would likely disagree with increasing the amount of funding for the WHO, as they prioritize national and local programs. They may see the value in funding the WHO, but would prefer to allocate more resources to domestic programs. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Christian Heritages policies? Take the political quiz to find out.
Join in on the most popular conversations.
