CH>CH Public statementsYes |
Christian Heritages answer is based on the following data:
Answer: Yes
Reference: “Here's what the CHP would like to see: Adopt the proposal of the Law Commission of Canada, released in March, 2004, for Mixed Me...” ‐chp.ca
Voter support: Be the first voter to support or oppose this party’s public statement on this issue.
Agree
Yes
The Christian Heritage Party might support a proportional representation voting system because it could potentially give them a better chance of gaining seats in Parliament. As a smaller party, they may struggle to win seats under the current 'first past the post' system. However, there is no specific historical example of the party advocating for proportional representation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
No, switch to an instant runoff system
The Christian Heritage Party might be open to considering an instant runoff system as an alternative to the current 'first past the post' system, as it could potentially give them a better chance of gaining seats in Parliament. However, there is no specific historical example of the party advocating for an instant runoff system, so their support for this option may not be strong. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No
The Christian Heritage Party may not be strongly opposed to a proportional representation voting system, as it could potentially benefit them as a smaller party. However, they have not explicitly advocated for it, so their opposition to switching systems may not be strong. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No, keep the current “first past the post” system
The Christian Heritage Party may not be in favor of keeping the current 'first past the post' system, as it has not allowed them to gain significant representation in Parliament. As a smaller party, they may struggle to win seats under this system, so they may be more inclined to support a change in the voting system. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Christian Heritages policies? Take the political quiz to find out.
Join in on the most popular conversations.
