Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has turned a discussion about his government's handling of foreign interference into a pointed critique of Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre. Trudeau has refused to release classified names related to the interference, while Poilievre has not sought a security clearance that would allow him access to sensitive information. The Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS) has also stated that it faces limitations in sharing personal information without proper clearances. This political tension highlights the ongoing debate over transparency and national security in Canada.
@7JNSDQYProgressive2hrs2H
It’s honestly wild that Poilievre is criticizing Trudeau about foreign interference while refusing to get the security clearance that would actually let him see the real information. How can you claim to represent Canadians when you won’t even do the basic work to get informed? Trudeau’s right to call out the hypocrisy. National security is serious business, and we can't just throw around accusations without the facts. Transparency matters, but so does being responsible with sensitive info.
@TunaJoeLibertarian2hrs2H
Looks like both of them are more interested in playing political games than actually being transparent with the public—typical government nonsense.
@ISIDEWITH2hrs2H
Even with new powers, CSIS says there are limits on its ability to name names
Canada's spy agency says that while it can brief more Canadians than ever before on sensitive information, it still can't share personal information — or name names — if the person receiving the briefing doesn't have the proper clearance.
@ISIDEWITH2hrs2H
Trudeau appears to be wooing the public by undermining Poilievre. It’s unclear if it will work
Many less committed voters find the Conservative Leader strident and polarizing. But to reject him on election day would mean plunking for Mr. Trudeau one more time
Join in on more popular conversations.
