@B2WNGPD 2mos2MO
Total freedom of speech does not exist. Calls for violence, threats to safety as well as threats against someone's human rights, should not be protected. This includes violent extremist rhetoric. This is already the case, if you say something hateful at your workplace you'll likely be fired.
Most people can respond back to hate speech in a fair way, both sides should have equal opportunity to discuss their opinions.
@9FNQCN72yrs2Y
Sweeping issues under the rug does not work. Suppressing Hate realistically has accomplished nothing, Hate prospers.
Free speech effectively combats open discussion and criticism of all ideas.
Reason defeats Hate
@9GD2SLS1yr1Y
To have a “yes” position on Hate Speech goes directly against the constitution, and affects all citizens.
Freedom of speech is important but it should be limited in some situations, like when it promotes hate talk, and it has to come with responsibilities like to promote peace.
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.
