Hate speech is defined as public speech that expresses hate or encourages violence towards a person or group based on something such as race, religion, sex, or sexual orientation.
Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.
Show more types:
Narrow down the conversation to these participants:
Discussions from these authors are shown:
Political party:
Province/Territory:
Yes as long as it does not threaten violence or democracy
No, freedom of speech does not mean freedom of consequences.
@92ZQ3973yrs3Y
as long as you're not being a total **** or using religion to excuse it😍😍
Yes if we can define some boundaries
@8QVYYDR4yrs4Y
I do not believe hate speech should be normalized, rather constructive criticism for anything.
No. While I agree everyone has a right to free speech, you should be able to accept the repercussions that come with espousing divisive and "hate-filled" rhetoric.
Free speech is important, but hate speech against a specific group should not be allowed, the only thing about that, that should be done is some form of education and acceptance to whatever the hate speech is directed at.
@kuyugomodiLiberal5yrs5Y
Is this even a question or...
No, freedom of speech only protects you from the government in that they can't arrest you for what you say, and if we make hate speech legal, that treads on other people's rights and sets a really bad precedent that some people are less than others.
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.
