Try the political quiz
+

Reply

 @Waterworks123from Alberta  answered…4yrs4Y

No, increase alternative energy subsidies and put some regulations on drilling for now

  Deletedanswered…3yrs3Y

Yes, but with very strict environmental regulations, and if the local tribes that consider the area sacred ground are ok with it.

 @3SXNRFFanswered…5yrs5Y

 @897TFQ9 from New Jersey  answered…4yrs4Y

Drilling should not be allowed in any national parks or on any wildlife reserves.

 @5643HNNanswered…4yrs4Y

 @ISIDEWITHasked…7mos7MO

How would you feel if your favorite outdoor spot was suddenly turned into an industrial zone?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…7mos7MO

If animals could talk, what do you think a polar bear might say about drilling in their habitat?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…7mos7MO

Imagine a world where wilderness areas no longer exist; how does that make you feel about preserving natural habitats like Alaska's?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…7mos7MO

Would you rather have a world with more wilderness areas or more cities and industries, and why?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…7mos7MO

How do you think the balance between energy needs and wildlife conservation should be managed?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…7mos7MO

Can you think of a time when you felt a deep connection with nature, and how would you feel if that place was threatened by industrial development?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…7mos7MO

What's your take on the importance of energy independence versus environmental preservation?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…7mos7MO

If future generations could look back at our decisions today, what do you hope they would say about how we treated Earth's natural sanctuaries?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…7mos7MO

Is it possible to have technological advancement and still maintain untouched natural wonders, and how might we achieve that balance?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…7mos7MO

How do actions taken in places far from where we live, like Alaska, affect our lives and the planet as a whole?

 @6W67VX4 from Pennsylvania  answered…4yrs4Y

 @599JCD9answered…5yrs5Y

 @8HDMV9J from Utah  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, but have limits on how much drilling can be done at any given time

 @8PK69PX from Washington  answered…4yrs4Y

Companies should be able to decide what path is best for them and the government should not be involved at all.

 @84JHJXZ from GU  answered…4yrs4Y

 @63MBBW2 from Georgia  answered…4yrs4Y

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…3yrs3Y

No, this would threaten the continued existence of the wildlife species that rely on the refuge for survival.

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…3yrs3Y

No, this would threaten the ongoing existence of the wildlife species that rely on the refuge for continued survival

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…3yrs3Y

No, this would threaten the continual existence of the wildlife species that rely on the refuge for survival

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…3yrs3Y

No, this would threaten the ongoing existence of the wildlife species who rely on the refuge for survival

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…3yrs3Y

No, this would threaten the continuing existence of the wildlife species who rely on the refuge for survival

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…3yrs3Y

No, this would threaten the existence of the wildlife species who rely on the refuge for survival

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…3yrs3Y

No, this would threaten the continued survival of the wildlife species who rely on the refuge, and the oil development will worsen climate change

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…4yrs4Y

No, this would both threaten extinction of the wildlife who rely on the refuge and worsen climate change

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…4yrs4Y

No, this would threaten extinction of the wildlife who rely on the refuge and worsen climate change

  @RickStewart from Iowa  answered…3yrs3Y

The government should not own land, as across the globe government has always been the biggest polluter. Were the Alaska Wildlife Refuge privately owned, perhaps by a non-profit organization its owners/members could decide for themselves whether drilling is to be allowed.

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…3yrs3Y

No, this would threaten extinction of the wildlife who rely on the refuge and climate change would be worsened

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…3yrs3Y

No, this would threaten extinction of the wildlife who rely on the refuge and the oil development will worsen climate change

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…3yrs3Y

No, this would threaten the survival of the wildlife who rely on the refuge and worsen climate change as a result of further oil development

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…3yrs3Y

No, this would threaten the survival of the wildlife who rely on the refuge and the oil development would worsen climate change

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…3yrs3Y

No, this would threaten the continued survival of the wildlife species who rely on the refuge

 @8QKJ7R9 from Texas  answered…4yrs4Y

No, if they can do that with a Wildlife Refuge, what can they not do it in? There needs to be some places of safety.

 @8L2DQDJ from Pennsylvania  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8M94PFW from Florida  answered…4yrs4Y

I do not support the drilling for oil and instead support nuclear energy and other forms of energy but I prefer no government intervention in it.

 @TogetherinSoli1 from GU  answered…4yrs4Y

No, the importance of fossil fuels in today's society should be recognised, but we should move towards more sustainable energy

 @Mobdawwg from California  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, but increase alternative energy subsidies to eliminate our dependence on fossil fuels

 @8TWB9FX from Kansas  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, but include very strict environmental regulations. They also need to increase alternative energy subsidies so we can wean ourselves off of fossil fuels.

 @8V29GDP from Washington D.C.  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8W9C4WK from Pennsylvania  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, but with a license issued by the right agency or local sheriff / government official

 @8WMXBZM from Virginia  answered…3yrs3Y

 @8XSXMM6 from Oregon  answered…3yrs3Y

No, and TEMPORARILY give subsidies to eliminate dependence on fossil fuels to get people invested and further increase restrictions on the burning of fossil fuels.

 @8Y2PZNR from Missouri  answered…3yrs3Y

No, at least while it is a reserve which I think should apply to all reserves and national parks

 @8YW4MHH from Connecticut  answered…3yrs3Y

It should be decided by the state of Alaska, still with strict environmental regulations.

 @92MNDFW from California  answered…3yrs3Y