Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.
Show more types:
Narrow down the conversation to these participants:
Discussions from these authors are shown:
Political party:
Electoral District (2011):
Electoral District (2013):
@8VL9NFX4yrs4Y
Only for life-saving drugs or drugs that will greatly reduce suffering. And if a legal standard is put in place to protect the animals and retire them early into a rehab program.
@8V5Z6RL4yrs4Y
only if absolutely necessary for important MEDICAL advancements, NOT cosmetics
@8QDSNZY4yrs4Y
It depends if the animal can feel the pain or be killed in the process however animals should never be tested with cosmetics.
@5643HNN4yrs4Y
Yes, but an animal safety board should be implemented to oversee the treatment of the animals during testing
@JadedCynical5yrs5Y
Yes but without harming the animal.
@7PKT4CJ4yrs4Y
Yes, but the animals should be treated ethically
@3GZTJR25yrs5Y
Yes, but not for cosmetics and try to minimize the death/damage to the animal as much as possible
@7PTCG383yrs3Y
Yes, but not for cosmetics and only on mice or various rodent types of animal species
@7PTCG383yrs3Y
Yes, but not for cosmetics and only on mice or rodent animal species
@7PTCG383yrs3Y
Yes, but only on mice or rodent animal species and not for cosmetics
@4CV2FF24yrs4Y
Yes, but only until sufficient models have been established and tested. Increase the funding for the research into these models.
@8QDSNZY4yrs4Y
It depends if the animal can feel the pain or be killed in the process, If the animal dies will it be a quick death. However, animals should never be tested with cosmetics.
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.
