Narrow down the conversation to these participants:
Discussions from these authors are shown:
Political party:
Province/Territory:
@9WYDMSD6mos6MO
Yes, but a private company should not be the ones who do the project, the government should take it over, turn it into a state controlled industry and seize property as necessary so long as farmers and homeowners are compensated, corporate landowners will be given no compensation.
@9F98QST2yrs2Y
Only if the landowners give permission and are fairly compensated
@B2N5YCZ3mos3MO
They can build the pipeline, but they shouldn't be allowed to forcefully take way someone's property. They should consult the landowners first and only do it if they agree.
@995SMBC2yrs2Y
There should at least be a consensus for the community.
@8VQJCS54yrs4Y
Yes, if the owner consents
@8VJXJ2SConservative4yrs4Y
Yes but only IF the land owner agrees to sell the land. If not then they have to move the layout of the pipeline
@andreakkmr4yrs4Y
Yes, if there is a proper mitigation and compensation strategy.
@shaelynj4yrs4Y
no, find a better way but if it’s needed then the landowners need to be fairly compensated
@8NW2DWM4yrs4Y
Private property rights should be increased
@8KMCS9R4yrs4Y
No, but nationalize all oil, natural gas, and gasoline, keeping what is extracted from the tar sands for national use
@8JYQF8T4yrs4Y
Yes, if the owners are willing and fairly compensated
@8JDRVHP4yrs4Y
Yes, of the landowners have say and are more than fairly compensated for this may interfere with their long term family incomes
@8H6PJNM5yrs5Y
Pipeline is necessary but shouldn't need to go through private property
@8F3PG2ZConservative5yrs5Y
Yes, with excellent compensation to land owners, transparency, flawless quality control, and rerouting to avoid any vulnerable environments.
@8CCZXDP5yrs5Y
By "private property" do you mean reserve land? It kind of feels like you mean reserve land...
@9BZXLCF2yrs2Y
If the landowners are compensated and give consent to the project
@9B55SJD2yrs2Y
only if there is no other option
@99PTH5P2yrs2Y
@8VGTKWH4yrs4Y
No, but yes if not in private property
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.
