Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.
Narrow down the conversation to these participants:
Discussions from these authors are shown:
Electoral District (2011):
No - we should focus on nation wide analyses and audits of current healthcare spending and come up with rigorous evidence based plans to increase efficiency, decrease waste and prioritize highest impact health delivery
system reform and efficiencies without political consequence or agenda, AND more spending as needed.
Yes, but additional funding should only be provided to provinces with certain requirements on how they spend it
Yes, but at the same time encourage the use of a private health care system for those who can afford it.
Only if the increase is towards community and public health initiatives
If needed, but improve efficiency first. Reduce layers of management. Implement ISO 9001 or similar certification to enforce efficiency. Instead of putting in a bigger furnace, insulate first to stop the leaks!
keep it the same, except add more for mental health
@Matt117589Green4yrs4Y
Yes, with added programs to reduce acute hospital admissions for non emergent care
Only on parts that need increasing but not too much or else taxes will rise too much
Yes, however a two-tier system for private services should be more open to people who want to opt-out of national healthcare services.
Allow it but with boundaries.
Yes but only because of the amount of immigrants we have recently let in
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.
