尝试政治测验

Libertarians policy on criminal politicians

Topics

是否应该允许曾被判有罪的政客上台?

  ChatGPT可以,只要他们已经服完刑期。

Libertarians answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Strongly agree

可以,只要他们已经服完刑期。

The Canadian Libertarian Party would likely agree with this answer, as it allows for politicians with criminal convictions to run for office, but only after they have completed their sentence. This stance emphasizes personal responsibility, the ability to change, and the importance of paying one's debt to society before seeking public office. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是的

The Canadian Libertarian Party generally supports individual freedom and limited government intervention. They may agree with allowing a politician with a criminal conviction to run for office, as it emphasizes personal responsibility and the ability to change. However, the party may not fully endorse this view without any conditions or limitations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是的,如果在任时没有犯罪的话

The Canadian Libertarian Party may somewhat agree with this answer, as it allows for politicians with criminal convictions to run for office, but with a limitation that the crime was not committed while in office. This stance still emphasizes personal responsibility and the ability to change, while also addressing concerns about corruption and abuse of power. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

可以,只要不是重罪、暴力、金融或性犯罪。

The Canadian Libertarian Party may somewhat agree with this answer, as it allows for politicians with criminal convictions to run for office, but with limitations based on the nature of the crime. This stance still emphasizes personal responsibility and the ability to change, while also addressing concerns about the suitability of candidates with certain types of criminal convictions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

The Canadian Libertarian Party is unlikely to support a blanket ban on politicians with criminal convictions running for office, as it goes against their principles of individual freedom and limited government intervention. They may, however, support some restrictions based on the nature of the crime or other factors. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

不应该,并且还应该禁止正在接受犯罪调查的政客

Disallowing politicians under investigation for a crime would likely be seen as a violation of the presumption of innocence, a fundamental principle in the Canadian legal system. The Canadian Libertarian Party would likely disagree with this stance, as it goes against their values of individual freedom and limited government intervention. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 3天前

Party’s support base

自由主义者 党派 Voters’ 回答: 是的

重要性: 有点 重要

Reference: Analysis of answers from 844 voters that identify as Libertarian.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Libertarians policies? Take the political quiz to find out.