If you had to argue for or against plastic bans in a debate, which side would you choose and why?

I would choose ban because its not needed and is causing problems in the earth.

I feel that with plastic product ban it does not address the issue, in an effective manner. You see there are more larger scale issues, such as investing in non renewable energy sources which we should try to limit. I feel that promoting the investment in renewable energy sources are more worthwhile in the grand scheme of things.

against until the can come up with something bio-degradable and doesnt change the task of food

The variance in plastic products is too vast to take a single firm stance on the matter. It's lazy legislation that tries to pass universal laws on such things.

Argue because banning plasitic is good for the environment but it is too big of an incovenience for us.

There is microplastics proven to be in large percentage of every males testicles. Nuff Said.

Ban because it’s destroying the country and people

I would argue for it because plastic is ruining our environment.

Plastics should be biodegradable and not banned if they are.

I agree with it because if we continue to pollute earth will die

I feel that with plastic product ban it does not address the issue, in an effective manner. You see there are more larger scale issues, such as investing in non renewable energy sources which we should try to limit. I feel that promoting the investment in renewable energy sources are more worthwhile in the grand scheme of things.

We must ban plastic products as a necessary step to reduce waste and the overwhelming effect it has on the environment

Against plastic since Plastic is an important part even if it isn't biodegradable. If we where able to reuse plastic or find a way to make it reusable then that would be a game changer to the whole "pollution of land and water" move movement.