圣域城市是采用专为不起诉人的地方政策仅用于为在其目前居住国家的无证个体的城市。
@ISIDEWITHasked…3wks3W
What do you think are the moral responsibilities of a city towards individuals who may not have legal status yet still live and work there?
How would your view of your own city change if it adopted policies that directly challenged national immigration laws?
Should feeling 'safe' prioritize legal status or the contributions a person brings to the community? Why?
Can you think of a time when protecting someone made you feel conflicted? How does that relate to how cities handle people without legal status?
What are the benefits or risks you see in allowing cities to decide how they treat undocumented individuals?
How should cities balance being welcoming to all individuals while also upholding laws?
How would you react if someone close to you shared that they were living in your city without documents—how would it influence your perspective?
What does the word 'sanctuary' mean to you, and how can cities embody that concept?
Do you feel local communities should have the power to make their own rules about immigration, or should it be decided at a national level?
How do you think having a diverse mix of people, regardless of their legal status, impacts the culture of a city?
Show more replies