Statistics are shown for this demographic
Province/Territory
Response rates from 1.3k Kelowna - Lake Country voters.
44% Yes |
56% No |
44% Yes |
52% No |
0% Yes but decrease the amount of sanctuary cities. |
3% No, and we should ban the use of sanctuary cities |
0% Yes, but fine companies that employ illegal immigrants |
0% No, and all federal funding is unconstitutional |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 1.3k Kelowna - Lake Country voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 1.3k Kelowna - Lake Country voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Kelowna - Lake Country voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@9K6JKN39mos9MO
No. Those cities should use the people for some jobs to maintain those cities. Start assimilating them in to the culture sooner than later.
@9FN75NH1yr1Y
dont think this applies to canada?
@9V798RX2mos2MO
Yes, but have these cities closely monitored, screen the people before entering, and limit the number of sanctuary cities.
@9V2YV4B2mos2MO
I don’t want federal funding if it comes with control—let cities do their own thing without strings attached.
@9HXHR3Y11mos11MO
Yes, but to a certain point, where it is enough to do further research on the indivieul's past to encore any of their records interme of criminal offenses.
@9HCP7QV12mos12MO
No. We should ban Sanctuary Cities, and Municipalities are under Provincial jurisdiction - the Federal government should not be infringing on Provincial matters.
@9H8JPC212mos12MO
Depending on the situation of an individual, there may be circumstances where they must live undocumented. So funding should be the same throughout each city.
@9H4KM541yr1Y
There should not be sanctuary cities. We wouldn't need them if the government would slow down on letting so many people into the Canada.
Join in on the most popular conversations.
